- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:56:51 +1000
- To: "public-rdf-sha." <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
On the test path-complex-002, I have clarified in the Test Suite document that path structures must not share blank nodes. As a result of this the test became invalid and I have deleted it. Holger On 20/04/2017 15:46, Holger Knublauch wrote: > Hi Peter, > > thanks for the next round of test cases as submitted here: > > https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/pull/54 > > Among them are tests that verify that a SHACL Core implementation does > not accidentally also handle SHACL-SPARQL features. In order to > support such tests, I have added an optional flag to the test harness, > as described here: > > https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/abcf2cb9ab591870240d37ebabcaedcbf5f1bcbd > > > In the commit above I have added such mf:requires triples to some of > your tests. Please double-check that these changes reflect the > intention of the test case. > > I then spent an hour or so trying to find the three subtle bugs in > your next test case; fixed: > > https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/2359a8704b078f4259a0eb0453f42afb563b7daf > > > and then further time consuming errors, as fixed: > > https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/4f46e168eeb99c8176dd9dc70c6efec88cc34e23 > > > Please don't submit test cases unless you have run them yourself or > otherwise ensured quality. Also the formatting of the source code is > very poor, making it difficult to decipher. I have a lot of other > things in my queue, such as the 11 new GitHub issues that you have > submitted today. May I remind you of the "sloppiness" that you have > complained about countless times while reviewing the SHACL spec? > > Holger >
Received on Thursday, 20 April 2017 05:57:28 UTC