- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 14:00:17 +1000
- To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
These test files were auto-generated from another source of (TopBraid) tests. I have now removed the owl:imports <http://datashapes.org/dash> triples, which were left-overs from these source files. This should resolve any relevant dependency on that namespace. The remaining usage in URIs is equivalent to, say, http://example.org and has no practical impact. https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/c68ed144be3c3e8c9daa69d9467f95e524ebc004 Holger On 14/04/2017 7:04, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > I think that this is quite different. > > The external OWL 2 repository is a place for test cases, but is unofficial and > separate from the official test suite, with no W3C status. If this repository > disappears then nothing should change about OWL. > > The SHACL test cases are official. The owner of datashapes.org may want to > prohibit its use in the test cases in the future, which could be problematic > for SHACL. > > peter > > On 04/13/2017 09:14 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: >> I'm not sure there's a problem with it. I observe >> https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-conformance/#References has: >> >> >> 7 References >> >> [Contributed Test Cases] >> Public Test Case Repository >> <http://owl.semanticweb.org/page/OWL_2_Test_Cases>. >> >> which is http://owl.semanticweb.org/page/OWL_2_Test_Cases >> >> However, I also think it'd be fine to change. Maybe >> http://www.w3.org/2017/shacl/test/* ? >> >> What that be good? >> >> -- Sandro >> >> >> On 04/13/2017 10:19 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >>> The SHACL test cases use datashapes.org. Is it appropriate for a W3C test >>> suite to use a third-party domain? >>> >>> Peter F. Patel-Schneider >>> Nuance Communications >>>
Received on Friday, 14 April 2017 04:00:55 UTC