Re: SHACL for SHACL

>
>
> Unfortunately this exercise confirms my long-held belief that the current
> work-around to avoid structural recursion leads to unmaintainable and
> redundant shape definitions. SHACL users will get negatively surprised by
> this. I believe we have made a mistake in SHACL by generally making
> structural recursion undefined.
>

I completely agree on that.

In fact, that is one of the main differences between ShEx and SHACL.

-- 
Regards, Jose Labra