public-rdf-shapes@w3.org from September 2016 by date

Friday, 30 September 2016

• Re: on constraints Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on constraints Dimitris Kontokostas
• on classes from the SHACL vocabulary Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• on constraints Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 29 September 2016

• on poor wording and loose terminology for prefix handling Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-155 Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: on evaluation Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-106 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-163 Arnaud Le Hors

Wednesday, 28 September 2016

• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-155 Irene Polikoff
• Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on evaluation Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org Wendy Seltzer
• Re: on evaluation Irene Polikoff
• Re: on evaluation Karen Coyle
• Re: on evaluation Karen Coyle
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-107 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-106 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on evaluation Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-142 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-142 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: comment about SHACL Status of This Document Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org Jeremy J Carroll
• Re: About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org Jeremy J Carroll
• Re: About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org Arnaud Le Hors
• comment about SHACL Status of This Document Jeremy J Carroll
• Re: About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org Jeremy J Carroll
• Re: About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org Jeremy J Carroll
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-142 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-106 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-107 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-163 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on literals as shapes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-107 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-106 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-107 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-106 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: on literals as shapes Karen Coyle
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-163 Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-163 Karen Coyle
• Re: on evaluation Karen Coyle
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-142 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Validating instances based on other instances Simon Steyskal
• Re: Validating instances based on other instances Miika Alonen
• Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Validating instances based on other instances Simon Steyskal
• Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org Simon Steyskal
• on the closing of ISSUE-107 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• on the closing of ISSUE-106 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• on the closing of ISSUE-163 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• on the closing of ISSUE-155 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 27 September 2016

• Re: on literals as shapes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• on the closing of ISSUE-142 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on literals as shapes Holger Knublauch
• Re: on literals as shapes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on literals as shapes Holger Knublauch
• Re: on evaluation Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on evaluation Holger Knublauch
• on order of evaluation in SHACL vs SPARQL [was Re: Order of filters] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• on literals as shapes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on evaluation Karen Coyle
• Re: Deep copy Karen Coyle
• Re: Validating instances based on other instances Miika Alonen
• more on recursion [was Re: fun with sh:hasShape] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: fun with sh:hasShape Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: fun with sh:hasShape Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Validating instances based on other instances Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: on sh:Shape vs sh:shape Simon Steyskal
• Re: Validating instances based on other instances Simon Steyskal
• Re: Validating instances based on other instances Miika Alonen
• Re: on property constraints vs focus node constraints Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on definition and declaration Holger Knublauch
• Re: on property constraints vs focus node constraints Holger Knublauch
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL Holger Knublauch
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount Irene Polikoff
• Re: Deep copy Holger Knublauch

Monday, 26 September 2016

• Re: Deep copy Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL Holger Knublauch
• Re: on evaluation Holger Knublauch
• Re: on entailment Holger Knublauch
• Re: Deep copy Holger Knublauch
• Re: on sh:Shape vs sh:shape Holger Knublauch
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount Irene Polikoff
• Re: on sh:Shape vs sh:shape Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Validating instances based on other instances Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount Dimitris Kontokostas
• fun with sh:hasShape Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• on property constraints vs focus node constraints Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• on sh:Shape vs sh:shape Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on ontologies/vocabulary Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: On representation and typing Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on ontologies/vocabulary Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: on recursion in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on evaluation Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on entailment Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Deep copy Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on ontologies/vocabulary Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Validating instances based on other instances Miika Alonen
• Re: on ontologies/vocabulary Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: on recursion in SHACL Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: On representation and typing Holger Knublauch
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: on evaluation Holger Knublauch
• Re: on entailment Holger Knublauch
• Re: Deep copy Holger Knublauch
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL Holger Knublauch
• Re: Deep copy Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• on definition and declaration Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Deep copy Holger Knublauch
• On representation and typing Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL Holger Knublauch
• on ontologies/vocabulary Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• on entailment Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on undefined in SHACL Holger Knublauch
• on evaluation Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 25 September 2016

• Re: Union operations on graphs Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Different levels of SHACL Karen Coyle

Saturday, 24 September 2016

• $shapesGraph and sh:hasShape Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Union operations on graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Different levels of SHACL (and a new undefined notion and misuse of MAY) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Deep copy Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Different levels of SHACL Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Different levels of SHACL Karen Coyle
• Re: Deep copy Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Different levels of SHACL Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Union operations on graphs (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/) Dimitris Kontokostas

Friday, 23 September 2016

• divergence in the definition of sh:minCount Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: $this in Aggregations Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Different levels of SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: $shapesGraph Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Deep copy Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Order of filters Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• a general comment on Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL), W3C,Editor's Draft 22 September 2016 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• on access to the shapes graph in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• on undefined in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• on recursion in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• on property paths in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• on failure in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Order of filters (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/) Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Miika Alonen
• Deep copy (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/) Holger Knublauch
• Union operations on graphs (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/) Holger Knublauch
• $shapesGraph (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/) Holger Knublauch
• Order of filters (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/) Holger Knublauch
• Different levels of SHACL (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/) Holger Knublauch
• $this in Aggregations (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/) Holger Knublauch
• Re: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/ Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 22 September 2016

• Re: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/ Holger Knublauch
• Re: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/ Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/ Holger Knublauch
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Holger Knublauch
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Miika Alonen
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 21 September 2016

• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Holger Knublauch
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Miika Alonen
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Miika Alonen
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Holger Knublauch
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Miika Alonen

Friday, 16 September 2016

• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 15 September 2016

• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Miika Alonen
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Miika Alonen

Wednesday, 14 September 2016

• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Holger Knublauch
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Miika Alonen
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Miika Alonen
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Dimitris Kontokostas
• Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration Miika Alonen

Saturday, 10 September 2016

• Re: [CODE4LIB] SHACL Core abstract syntax Karen Coyle

Wednesday, 7 September 2016

• Re: [CODE4LIB] SHACL Core abstract syntax Stuart A. Yeates

Tuesday, 6 September 2016

• Re: [CODE4LIB] SHACL Core abstract syntax Karen Coyle
• Re: [CODE4LIB] SHACL Core abstract syntax Stuart A. Yeates

Last message date: Friday, 30 September 2016 13:49:20 UTC