UCR Status of This Document ? (was Re: comment about SHACL Status of This Document)

Hi!

Since our UCR ED has also been published in the TR space, I was 
wondering how its sotd should be amended in order to satisfy "MUST 
include expectations about next steps".

Currently, the relevant paragraph reads as follows:

"This document was published by the RDF Data Shapes Working Group as an 
Editor's Draft. If you wish to make comments regarding this document, 
please send them to public-rdf-shapes@w3.org (subscribe, archives). All 
comments are welcome."

Would it suffice to change this paragraph to something like (similar to 
[1]):

"This document was published by the RDF Data Shapes Working Group as an 
Editor's Draft. This document is intended to become a W3C Working Group 
Note. If you wish to make comments regarding this document, please send 
them to public-rdf-shapes@w3.org (subscribe, archives). This Editor's 
Draft is expected to advance to Working Group Note no earlier than 
<date>. All comments are welcome. "


br,
simon

[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/

---
DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna

www: http://www.steyskal.info/  twitter: @simonsteys

Am 2016-09-28 20:43, schrieb Arnaud Le Hors:
> Point taken. I'll try to make sure the next draft addresses that
> point.
> 
> Incidentally, to answer your question, I can tell you that I expect at
> least one more WD to be published before we get to CR, very possibly
> more.
> 
> Furthermore, among other things, until we have all issues closed we
> cannot contemplate moving to CR. You can check the status on that
> front by a simple look to tracker:
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/open [1]
> 
> While Last Call was dropped from the Recommendation track, the
> requirement for "wide review" wasn't. It is recognized as a rather
> fuzzy requirement but you can expect a clear signal to this list and
> others when we think we're about done.
> 
> Thank you for pointing out the missing piece in our SOTD.
> --
> Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies
> - IBM Cloud
> 
> From: Jeremy J Carroll <jjc@syapse.com>
> To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
> Date: 09/28/2016 08:28 PM
> Subject: comment about SHACL Status of This Document
> 
> -------------------------
> 
> This is a formal comment on:
> https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/#sotd [2]
> 
> I would like to review the Shapes Constraint Language as the Working
> Group draws towards having a completed document.
> 
> Mistakenly, I was waiting for a Last Call.
> 
> In lieu of a last call, the 2015 process doc, requires:
> https://www.w3.org/2015/Process-20150901/#general-requirements [3]
> 
> Every document published as part of the technical report development
> process
> […] _must_ include information about the status of the document.
> This status information
> […]
> 
>  * _must_ include expectations about next steps,
> 
> In the SOTD of the August 14 publication, no such expectations are
> set.
> In particular, I would welcome information about whether the WG hopes
> that the next step will be to advance to CR, or whether the next step
> will be a further WD.
> 
> Thank you
> 
> Jeremy J. Carroll
> (personal capacity)
> 
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/open
> [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/#sotd
> [3] https://www.w3.org/2015/Process-20150901/#general-requirements

Received on Thursday, 6 October 2016 06:55:55 UTC