Tuesday, 29 November 2016
Monday, 28 November 2016
- Re: on property paths in SHACL
- Re: on property paths in SHACL
- Re: read-through of Sections 5 and 7 (response to section 7)
- Re: read-through of Sections 5 and 7 (response to section 5)
Sunday, 27 November 2016
Saturday, 26 November 2016
Wednesday, 23 November 2016
- Re: incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components
- Re: undocumented changes to SHACL
- Re: incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components
- Re: incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components
Tuesday, 22 November 2016
- Re: incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components
- Re: incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components
- Re: on the closing of ISSUE-155
- Re: editorial comment on https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/ff393869ede0843fd9135542c4da7f61e500d1b1?diff=split
- editorial comment on https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/ff393869ede0843fd9135542c4da7f61e500d1b1?diff=split
- Re: $this in Aggregations
- Re: on the closing of ISSUE-155
- Re: on the closing of ISSUE-155
- incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components
- Re: eliminating property constraints
- Re: eliminating property constraints
- Using SHACL at the Europeana Foundation to validate EDM
- test suite data structures
- undocumented changes to SHACL
- on ISSUE-196
- Re: $this in Aggregations
- Re: more on recursion [was Re: fun with sh:hasShape]
- Re: more on recursion [was Re: fun with sh:hasShape]
Monday, 21 November 2016
- Re: more on recursion [was Re: fun with sh:hasShape]
- Re: on property paths in SHACL
- Re: more on recursion [was Re: fun with sh:hasShape]
- Re: more on recursion [was Re: fun with sh:hasShape]
- Re: on property paths in SHACL
Sunday, 20 November 2016
Saturday, 19 November 2016
Thursday, 17 November 2016
Tuesday, 15 November 2016
- Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL
- Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL
- Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL
- Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL
- Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL
- Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL
- Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL
Monday, 14 November 2016
- Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL
- Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL
- Re: some comments on SHACL editors' draft of 8 November
- Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL
- two interesting test cases for SHACL
Sunday, 13 November 2016
- Re: on removing pre-binding from the core of SHACL
- Re: some comments on SHACL editors' draft of 8 November