- From: Adam Kimball <akimball@healthwise.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 16:26:17 +0000
- To: "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
It's tough being a designer because it means that you need to let something go when there are still a few potential tweaks left. However, a big part of the process includes the ability to know when your next tweak is essential or just polish. With that in mind, I urge you all to work together and make the recommendation. Because: * Many ontologists do not have software development backgrounds and struggle with the few existing technologies. But they can build shapes and bring tons of values to their work. I know this because I work with such an individual and he is using SHACL today for our work (with the SPARQL extension). * To help the software development architects and managers who believe semantic tech is the way forward but struggle to show it is still alive and viable. I know this because I recently had to do it. Don't underestimate the power of the W3C's stamp of support. A thousand hacker news posts of support is nothing by comparison. * Offer an olive branch back to the many individuals who wanted to use these technologies but found the standards increasingly headed towards the arcane. * Stop the bleed to graph databases that have given up on the standards community Our non-profit mission at Healthwise is to help people make better health decisions. And our consumer-focused medical ontology is built to help them do just that. So, I ask everyone on the committee to do the right thing for us and others who are working to deliver knowledge to a community-in-need. Get the recommendation and get it released. Adam Kimball Director of Engineering Healthwise, Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2016 21:31:19 UTC