Re: difference between sh:hasValue and sh:in from Holger Knublauch on 2016-12-12 (public-rdf-shapes@w3.org from December 2016)

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:06:56 +1000
To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
Message-ID: <5de5eb45-7d36-ebb2-37c0-a09fb66152fc@topquadrant.com>

What would you suggest:
a) disallow bnodes for both
b) allow bnodes for both.

I have no strong opinion on this. Does anyone have use cases for bnodes 
in sh:hasValue?

Holger

On 12/12/2016 7:34, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> sh:hasValue allows blank nodes but sh:in does not.
>
>
> This difference does not seem to have any rationale.  If blank nodes are
> allowed for sh:hasValue then they should be allowed for sh:in.
>
>
>
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> Nuance Communications
>

Received on Monday, 12 December 2016 00:07:27 UTC