- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:06:46 -0800
- To: "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
The SHACL document uses "RDF node" in several places. However, RDF node is not a term defined in RDF. The replacement should probably be "RDF term". In other places, only "node" is used, in particular at the beginning of section 3. "Node" only has a definition in RDF in the context of a particular graph. This causes problems for targets that are not nodes in the data graph, as in Data graph ex:i1 rdf:type ex:c . Shapes graph se:rdf:type sh:Shape ; sh:targetNode ex:i2 ; sh:class ex:c . Some occurrences of "node" should probably be replaced with "RDF term". Peter F. Patel-Schneider Nuance Communications
Received on Sunday, 11 December 2016 22:07:18 UTC