- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 17:33:47 +0000
- To: "Gray, Alasdair J G" <A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk>
- Cc: Terry Roach <troach@capsi.com.au>, "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAE35Vmw1uchU=E7QP9kEax36hTYh1-6DTcwfBZCjz7f7U-scZg@mail.gmail.com>
Sorry, but I see zero advantages of ShEx over SPIN/SPARQL. Why would I want to lock my software into a new non-standard syntax with close to none adoption, when I can simply use the query engine to validate constraints? On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 at 18.26, Gray, Alasdair J G <A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 10 Dec 2016, at 11:52, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org> > wrote: > > In case of SHACL specifically, I think the problem is that while SPIN was > an elegant concept on top of SPARQL, shoehorning constraints into a > vocabulary is a model mismatch, a little like putting an ORM on top of > RDBMS: it works most of the time, but there will always be corner cases you > cannot hammer out. > > > If this is indeed the case, why is the group not building upon the purpose > defined ShEx approach? > > Its concise notation makes it very elegant for defining constraints. I > have been using it in a tool for almost two years now. The tool is quick > and easy to adapt to new sets of constraints by specifying a new ShEx > schema. > > I also find its use of exclusive or more naturally fits the requirements I > have encountered for constraint specifications. > > Best regards, > > Alasdair > > Alasdair J G Gray > Fellow of the Higher Education Academy > Assistant Professor in Computer Science, > School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences > (Athena SWAN Bronze Award) > Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh UK. > > Email: A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk > Web: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~ajg33 > ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5711-4872 > Office: Earl Mountbatten Building 1.39 > Twitter: @gray_alasdair > > ------------------------------ > > Founded in 1821, Heriot-Watt is a leader in ideas and solutions. With > campuses and students across the entire globe we span the world, delivering > innovation and educational excellence in business, engineering, design and > the physical, social and life sciences. > > The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) are confidential. > If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any disclosure, > copying, distribution or use of its contents is strictly prohibited, and > you should please notify the sender immediately and then delete it > (including any attachments) from your system. >
Received on Sunday, 11 December 2016 17:34:33 UTC