- From: Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 14:27:53 -0400
- To: Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CADE8KM4=kvgCgQntvoZHrHWsT+WY4G80ZNDFx55sLvwZN9HVKg@mail.gmail.com>
It does seem puzzling. if an IncorporatedCompany (IC) can have no values for hasControllingInterestParty (hCIP) , but if it has any values for that property, at least one such value must be a VotingShareholder (VS) , the usual way of expressing this choice would be with a disjunction: Class: IC SubClassOf: hCIP exactly 0 or hCIP some VS Simon On Aug 2, 2016 1:43 PM, "Vladimir Alexiev" <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com> wrote: > Several comments about > http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/data-shapes-ucr/#uc10-cardinality-0: > - the code Example should mention it's in OWL Manchester notation > - second bullet "at least one of them should be known to be a > VotingShareholder": > maybe I don't understand OWL qualified cardinality, but doesn't "min 0" > mean there can be 0 VotingShareholders? > - Summary: I don't understand how any of the 2 sentences follow from the > example. > 1. "Requires the possibility to select focus nodes based on specific > conditions" > Just doesn't seem to have a connection. > 2. "Requires the possibility to specify default values." > I guess a default VotingShareholder (if there possibly can be such a > thing) could fulfill a "min 1" cardinality, bu t > > >
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2016 18:35:34 UTC