W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > April 2015

Re: vote for supporting "closed shapes"

From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:23:53 -0700
Message-ID: <55382D89.40004@berkeley.edu>
To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
CC: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
hello martynas.

On 2015-04-22 16:12, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
> could you maybe illustrate what you mean with a little example? Thanks.

http://www.w3.org/2015/ShExpressivity#coverageEtc is explaining all of 
this much better than anything i could do.

ideally, i'd also like to see features that would allow to constrain 
additional triples to certain vocabularies. but that's probably a 
problem because RDF has no way of identifying vocabularies. maybe by 
providing URI prefix patterns? that's just a quick and dirty idea, but 
these are the kind of features that are needed.



erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu  -  tel:+1-510-2061079 |
            | UC Berkeley  -  School of Information (ISchool) |
            | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2015 23:24:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:41 UTC