public-rdf-shapes@w3.org from July 2014 by date

Thursday, 31 July 2014

• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Holger Knublauch
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Holger Knublauch
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Simon Spero
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Wondering about an example of closed world validation Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Arthur Ryman
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Arthur Ryman
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Arthur Ryman
• Re: Wondering about an example of closed world validation Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Wondering about an example of closed world validation Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Wondering about an example of closed world validation Bernard Vatant
• Re: Wondering about an example of closed world validation Dimitris Kontokostas
• Semantic Web Languages Architecture diagram Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 30 July 2014

• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Holger Knublauch
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: "What if" thoughts on a class of shape use cases john.walker
• Re: Wondering about an example of closed world validation Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Simon Spero
• Wondering about an example of closed world validation Bernard Vatant
• RE: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Irene Polikoff
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Irene Polikoff
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Eric Prud'hommeaux

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

• Re: Should we say "data model"? Holger Knublauch
• Re: Should we say "data model"? Kendall Clark
• Re: Should we say "data model"? Holger Knublauch
• Re: Should we say "data model"? Kendall Clark
• Re: Should we say "data model"? Paul
• Re: Should we say "data model"? Kendall Clark
• Re: Should we say "data model"? Bernard Vatant
• Re: Should we say "data model"? Karen Coyle
• RE: Should we say "data model"? Irene Polikoff
• Re: Should we say "data model"? Kendall Clark
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Dimitris Kontokostas
• Should we say "data model"? Bernard Vatant
• "What if" thoughts on a class of shape use cases Simon Spero
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Eric Prud'hommeaux

Monday, 28 July 2014

• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: OSLC Resource Shapes implemented with SPIN Holger Knublauch

Sunday, 27 July 2014

• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• AW: Thoughts on validation requirements Bosch, Thomas
• Re: implementing ShEx recursive shapes Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• AW: OWL is hard? Bosch, Thomas
• Re: implementing ShEx recursive shapes Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: non-normative reference to Z in ShEx def Eric Prud'hommeaux

Saturday, 26 July 2014

• Re: OSLC Resource Shapes implemented with SPIN Holger Knublauch
• Re: OSLC Resource Shapes implemented with SPIN Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• implementing ShEx recursive shapes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• non-normative reference to Z in ShEx def Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Mapping of Description Set Profiles (DSPs) to SPIN Bosch, Thomas
• Mapping from OWL 2 to SPIN Bosch, Thomas
• RE: A view from outside Markus Lanthaler
• Re: A view from outside Holger Knublauch

Friday, 25 July 2014

• Re: OWL is hard? Simon Spero
• IBM Position on OSLC Shapes, SPARQL, SPIN, and ShEx Arthur Ryman
• Re: OWL is hard? Michel Dumontier
• OWL is hard? Kendall Clark
• AW: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations Bosch, Thomas
• Re: A view from outside Lars Marius Garshol
• Re: A view from outside Jerven Tjalling Bolleman
• Re: A view from outside john.walker
• AW: Database of Requirements on RDF Validation: http://purl.org/net/rdf-validation Bosch, Thomas
• A view from outside Lars Marius Garshol
• OSLC Resource Shapes implemented with SPIN Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 24 July 2014

• Re: TopQuadrant's position on RDF Shapes working group Holger Knublauch
• Re: TopQuadrant's position on RDF Shapes working group Karen Coyle
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations Jerven Tjalling Bolleman
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations Holger Knublauch
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations Holger Knublauch
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations Paul
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations Holger Knublauch
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations Olivier Rossel
• Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations Jerven Bolleman
• Re: Database of Requirements on RDF Validation: http://purl.org/net/rdf-validation Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: TopQuadrant's position on RDF Shapes working group Holger Knublauch
• Re: Draft: SPIN Minimum Profile Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 23 July 2014

• Re: Draft: SPIN Minimum Profile Karen Coyle
• Re: Draft: SPIN Minimum Profile Steve Speicher
• AW: Database of Requirements on RDF Validation: http://purl.org/net/rdf-validation Bosch, Thomas
• Draft: SPIN Minimum Profile Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 22 July 2014

• Re: Reminder of the workshop and its outcome Holger Knublauch
• Re: [OFFICIAL] - RE: name of the group Dave Reynolds
• Re: Reminder of the workshop and its outcome Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: [OFFICIAL] - RE: name of the group Karen Coyle
• Re: Flexible schema inclusions and overloading in ShEx. Simon Spero
• RE: [OFFICIAL] - RE: name of the group Irene Polikoff
• Re: [OFFICIAL] - RE: name of the group Karen Coyle
• Thoughts on validation requirements Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Reminder of the workshop and its outcome Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Reminder of the workshop and its outcome Kendall Clark
• Reminder of the workshop and its outcome Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: [OFFICIAL] - RE: name of the group Kendall Clark
• Re: [OFFICIAL] - RE: name of the group Paul
• [OFFICIAL] - RE: name of the group Paul Davidson
• Re: name of the group Dave Reynolds
• RE: in between position Irene Polikoff
• RE: name of the group Irene Polikoff
• name of the group Sandro Hawke
• Re: in between position Irene Polikoff
• Re: Flexible schema inclusions and overloading in ShEx. Olivier Rossel
• Re: Flexible schema inclusions and overloading in ShEx. Holger Knublauch
• Re: Flexible schema inclusions and overloading in ShEx. Olivier Rossel
• Re: Flexible schema inclusions and overloading in ShEx. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: TopQuadrant's position on RDF Shapes working group Sandro Hawke
• Flexible schema inclusions and overloading in ShEx. Olivier Rossel
• RE: in between position Dam, Jesse van
• Using OWL for RDF constraint checking and closed-world recognition Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: in between position Antoine Isaac
• in between position Paul
• Re: TopQuadrant's position on RDF Shapes working group Holger Knublauch
• Re: TopQuadrant's position on RDF Shapes working group Simon Spero
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN Holger Knublauch
• TopQuadrant's position on RDF Shapes working group Holger Knublauch

Monday, 21 July 2014

• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN Sandro Hawke
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN Sandro Hawke
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN Jerven Bolleman
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN Sandro Hawke
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN Jerven Bolleman
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN Sandro Hawke
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN Kendall Clark
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN Sandro Hawke
• RE: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Dam, Jesse van
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN Kendall Clark
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: comparing to OWL and SPIN Dam, Jesse van

Sunday, 20 July 2014

• Questions about ShEx Z specification Simon Spero
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: owl for interface constraints Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: owl for interface constraints Simon Spero
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Simon Spero
• owl for interface constraints Sandro Hawke
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Simon Spero
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Evren Sirin

Saturday, 19 July 2014

• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Sandro Hawke
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack Sandro Hawke
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack Thomas Baker
• Re: question about ShEx values Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: question about ShEx values Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: question about ShEx values Olivier Rossel

Friday, 18 July 2014

• reworking charter …. Jeremy J Carroll
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Kendall Clark
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Sandro Hawke
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Kendall Clark
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Sandro Hawke
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Jerven Bolleman
• clinical data value set example [Was: Re: question about ShEx values] Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: question about ShEx values Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Kendall Clark
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Kendall Clark
• Re: question about ShEx values Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: question about ShEx values Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• question about ShEx values Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF validation must compile down to SPARQL Jerven Tjalling Bolleman
• Re: RDF validation must compile down to SPARQL Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RDF validation must compile down to SPARQL Jerven Tjalling Bolleman
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Karen Coyle
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties Kendall Clark
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Kendall Clark

Thursday, 17 July 2014

• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties Holger Knublauch
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Holger Knublauch
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Simon Spero
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Karen Coyle
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Karen Coyle
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Kendall Clark
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Kendall Clark
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Karen Coyle
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN Simon Spero
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• comparing to OWL and SPIN Dam, Jesse van
• Database of Requirements on RDF Validation: http://purl.org/net/rdf-validation Bosch, Thomas
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties Jose María Alvarez Rodríguez
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Holger Knublauch
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties Jose Emilio Labra Gayo

Wednesday, 16 July 2014

• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties Simon Spero
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Jerven Bolleman
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Jerven Bolleman
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties Dimitris Kontokostas
• RE: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Dam, Jesse van

Tuesday, 15 July 2014

• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Holger Knublauch
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Jerven Bolleman
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Paul Hermans
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Sandro Hawke
• Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. Jerven Tjalling Bolleman

Monday, 14 July 2014

• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Holger Knublauch
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Holger Knublauch
• RE: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Dam, Jesse van
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Sandro Hawke
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Arthur Ryman

Saturday, 12 July 2014

• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 11 July 2014

• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Holger Knublauch
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Simon Spero
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Karen Coyle
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Solbrig, Harold R.
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Solbrig, Harold R.
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Jeremy J Carroll
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Karen Coyle
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: bugs in Eric's implementation of RDF shapes Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: cyclic rules Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: cyclic rules Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: cyclic rules Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 10 July 2014

• Re: cyclic rules Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: bugs in Eric's implementation of RDF shapes Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: cyclic rules Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: cyclic rules Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• bugs in Eric's implementation of RDF shapes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: cyclic rules Solbrig, Harold R.
• Re: cyclic rules Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: cyclic rules Solbrig, Harold R.
• Re: cyclic rules Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: cyclic rules Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: cyclic rules Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: cyclic rules Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: cyclic rules Solbrig, Harold R.
• cyclic rules Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Karen Coyle
• Re: prospective charter for a shapes validation WG Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: prospective charter for a shapes validation WG Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: prospective charter for a shapes validation WG Olivier Rossel
• Re: prospective charter for a shapes validation WG Sandro Hawke
• Re: prospective charter for a shapes validation WG Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 8 July 2014

• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Dimitris Kontokostas

Monday, 7 July 2014

• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Holger Knublauch
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Karen Coyle
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Arthur Ryman
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 3 July 2014

• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Arthur Ryman
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL John Snelson
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL john.walker
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Jeremy J Carroll

Wednesday, 2 July 2014

• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Oreste Signore
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL John Snelson
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 1 July 2014

• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL Eric Prud'hommeaux
• ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL john.walker

Last message date: Thursday, 31 July 2014 23:16:38 UTC