- From: Ian Dickinson <i.j.dickinson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:35:13 +0000
- To: Anthony Durity <a.durity@umail.ucc.ie>
- Cc: W3C Ruby RDF mailing list <public-rdf-ruby@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Ian Dickinson <i.j.dickinson@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Anthony Durity <a.durity@umail.ucc.ie> wrote: >> What about the SPARQL-y route? > Off the top of my head, untested: > > select distinct ?term { > { ?term ?p ?o } union > { ?s ?term ?o } union > { ?s ?p ?term } > > FILTER (!isBlank(?term)) > } > > Probably quite an expensive query on a store of any size, so be careful! Oops, you said no literals either. So the filter should be: FILTER (!isBlank(?term) && !isLiteral(?term)) Ian
Received on Tuesday, 21 November 2017 00:35:41 UTC