- From: Anthony Durity <a.durity@umail.ucc.ie>
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 18:42:15 +0000
- To: Tom Johnson <johnson.tom@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C Ruby RDF mailing list <public-rdf-ruby@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 20 November 2017 18:42:46 UTC
Thanks Tom! On 20 November 2017 at 17:31, Tom Johnson <johnson.tom@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is it as simple as > > repo.terms > > Yes. This is true about any `RDF::Enumerable` (`Graph`, `Repository`, > etc...). > > See http://www.rubydoc.info/github/ruby-rdf/rdf/RDF/ > Enumerable#terms-instance_method > > - Tom > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Anthony Durity <a.durity@umail.ucc.ie> > wrote: > >> Replying to self: >> >> If using >> repo = RDF::DataObjects::Repository.new uri: >> 'sqlite3:./db/development.sqlite3' >> Is it as simple as >> repo.terms >> ? >> >> What about the SPARQL-y route? >> >> On 20 November 2017 at 16:42, Anthony Durity <a.durity@umail.ucc.ie> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Trying to get a one dimensional array of all unique/distinct resources >>> in local store regardless be the resource a subject, predicate or object. >>> >>> To emphasize. I don't want distinct triples, I want distinct resources >>> (excluding literals and blank nodes). >>> >>> Both SPARQL-y and non SPARQL-y (Ruby RDF) answers welcome. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > -Tom Johnson >
Received on Monday, 20 November 2017 18:42:46 UTC