- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:21:36 -0500
- To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Paul Cotton wrote: > The Status section of this document needs to be updated: > > a) The following text from the first sentence is no longer true: > "This is the First Public Working Draft... Fixed. > b) ... I would like to suggest that you add a paragraph based > on your summary of changes > > "This Working Draft includes the following changes: > > * Updating HTML5 coercion to Infoset rules (normative) > * Clarifying how to extract RDFa attributes via Infoset (informative) > * Clarifying how to extract RDFa attributes via DOM2 (informative)" Done. Larry Masinter wrote: > In the Abstract section... > It might help to use "this specification" rather than > "this document" to avoid overloading "document". Done. Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > ]]The rules defined in this document not only apply to HTML5 documents > in non-XML and XML mode, but also to HTML4 documents interpreted > through the HTML5 parsing rules.[[ > > My question/suggestion: Shouldn't that sentence also say that HTML+RDFa > not only applies to HTML4 but also to XHTML documents when "interpreted > through the HTML5 parsing rules"? Agreed and done. The updated HTML5+RDFa version with corrections is here: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/ Diff-marked version against the HTML5+RDFa (Oct 15th 2009) FPWD is here: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/diffs/rdfa-diff-20091015-20100115.html -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Monarch - Next Generation REST Web Services http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2009/12/14/monarch/
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2010 05:22:05 UTC