On 01/02/2010 01:58 AM, Shane McCarron wrote: > As most of you know, the XHTML 2 working group is in the process of > adding @lang to XHTML 1.1 as part of its efforts to ensure that XHTML > 1.1 is maximally useful by assistive technologies. Since we claim that > XHTML+RDFa is a superset of XHTML 1.1, I believe we need to add @lang > here too. > > I am in the process of producing an XHTML+RDFa 1.1 editors draft, and I > am pondering what the inclusion of @lang means for the processing > rules. To me, it makes perfect sense to say that @lang and @xml:lang > both can define the language of an element, and that @xml:lang takes > precedence. This is what XHTML 1.1 says. Does anyone see a problem with > this? This sounds perfectly fine with me. It makes a small but irritating difference between HTML5 and XHTML versions go away, too. Thanks! Ivan > > -Shane > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:06 UTC