public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from September 2009 by date

Wednesday, 30 September 2009

• Integrated Philip Taylor's RDFa tests for XHTML, HTML4, HTML5 Manu Sporny
• Regrets for Thursday telecon Manu Sporny

Monday, 28 September 2009

• ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Manu Sporny

Saturday, 26 September 2009

• Re: Moving HTML+RDFa draft issues to HTML WG bug tracker Maciej Stachowiak
• markup in itemprop values, was: Re: microdata feedback Benjamin Nowack
• Moving HTML+RDFa draft issues to HTML WG bug tracker Manu Sporny

Friday, 25 September 2009

• Re: PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes Shane McCarron
• Re: PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes Philip Taylor
• Re: PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes Jeni Tennison
• Re: PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes Julian Reschke
• Minor typo in test 0102 of RDFa Test Harness Ivan Mikhailov
• Re: PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes Jeni Tennison
• Re: PROPOSAL: What would be in an RDFa Syntax 1.0 Second Edition Ivan Herman

Thursday, 24 September 2009

• Re: PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes Philip Taylor
• Re: PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes Shane McCarron
• Re: PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes Philip Taylor
• PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes Shane McCarron
• RDFa Task Force Meeting minutes for 2009-09-24 Ivan Herman
• PROPOSAL: What would be in an RDFa Syntax 1.0 Second Edition Shane McCarron
• Probable erratum - RDFA-SYNTAX (related to Issue-238: @src is a subject) = 4 changes in 2.1 + 6 + 6.3 + 6.3.2.3 Laurent.Lefort@csiro.au
• Re: I think xmlns:* shows up in element.attributes in Firefox and Safari even in xhtml+xml mode Steven Pemberton
• Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 24 September 2009, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny
• Telecon Agenda - Thursday 24 September 2009, 1500 UTC Ben Adida
• I think xmlns:* shows up in element.attributes in Firefox and Safari even in xhtml+xml mode Ben Adida
• ISSUE-239: PROPOSAL: Errata text to clarify CURIE-related processing requirements SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-238: ERRATUM for @src in final paragraph of Syntax 3.1 SWD Issue Tracker

Wednesday, 23 September 2009

• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Manu Sporny
• PROPOSAL: Errata text to clarify CURIE-related processing requirements Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Re: Parsing Curies from XSL in Firefox David Wood
• probable erratum - RDFA-SYNTAX 3.10. A description of RDFa in RDF terms Toby Inkster
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Toby Inkster
• Re: RDFa test cases Shane McCarron
• Namespace declarations for 'xml' and 'xmlns' Jeni Tennison
• Re: RDFa test cases Jeni Tennison
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Philip Taylor
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Toby Inkster
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Philip Taylor
• Re: RDFa test cases Philip Taylor
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Manu Sporny
• Re: HTML5 RDFa Test Suite (was Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) Manu Sporny
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Boris Zbarsky

Tuesday, 22 September 2009

• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Mark Birbeck
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Mark Birbeck
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Toby Inkster
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Toby Inkster
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Peter Mika
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: HTML5 RDFa Test Suite (was Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) Philip Taylor
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Julian Reschke
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• HTML5 RDFa Test Suite (was Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) Manu Sporny
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Mark Birbeck
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Sam Ruby
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Mark Birbeck
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Fixes to RDFa Test Suite Manu Sporny
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Julian Reschke
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Julian Reschke
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: The Complexity Argument Manu Sporny
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron

Monday, 21 September 2009

• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Errata text for RDFa Syntax section 5.5 step 2 Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: My first RDFa Web example (products) Martin Hepp (UniBW)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa James Graham
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa James Graham
• Re: XMLLiteral and stripping iquery/ifragment from <base> Philip Taylor
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Julian Reschke
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• XMLLiteral and stripping iquery/ifragment from <base> Manu Sporny
• librdfa 0.16 released (and new github home) Manu Sporny
• RDFa Test Suite source (via github) Manu Sporny

Sunday, 20 September 2009

• NEW RDFa Test Suite (XHTML1.1, HTML4 and HTML5) Manu Sporny

Saturday, 19 September 2009

• Re: The Complexity Argument (was: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) Ian Hickson
• Re: Per telco on the 2009-09-17 Mark Birbeck
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Maciej Stachowiak
• Per telco on the 2009-09-17 Ivan Herman
• Re: My first RDFa Web example (products) Martin Hepp (UniBW)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Parsing Curies from XSL in Firefox Mark Birbeck
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: The Complexity Argument (was: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) Jonas Sicking
• Parsing Curies from XSL in Firefox David Wood

Friday, 18 September 2009

• Re: My first RDFa Web example (products) Mark Birbeck
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• The Complexity Argument (was: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) Manu Sporny
• Re: My first RDFa Web example (products) Shane McCarron
• Re: My first RDFa Web example (products) Mark Birbeck
• Re: My first RDFa Web example (products) Manu Sporny
• Re: My first RDFa Web example (products) Evan Goer
• Re: My first RDFa Web example (products) Manu Sporny
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: head/@profile, profile link relation, was: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Manu Sporny
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Manu Sporny
• Re: [Fwd: DBpedia Pages now include RDFa] Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Meeting minutes, 2009-09-17 Ivan Herman
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking

Thursday, 17 September 2009

• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Meeting minutes, 2009-09-17 Mark Birbeck
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Philip Taylor
• Meeting minutes, 2009-09-17 Ivan Herman
• Re: [Fwd: DBpedia Pages now include RDFa] Kingsley Idehen
• Re: [Fwd: DBpedia Pages now include RDFa] Shane McCarron
• Re: [Fwd: DBpedia Pages now include RDFa] Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Analysis of RDFa Test Suite and XMLLiteral c14n Philip Taylor
• Re: [Fwd: DBpedia Pages now include RDFa] Shane McCarron
• Re: FYI: RDFa extension to Semantic Media Wiki... Toby Inkster
• Analysis of RDFa Test Suite and XMLLiteral c14n Manu Sporny
• [Fwd: DBpedia Pages now include RDFa] Ivan Herman
• Re: HTML+RDFa (3.1 Document Conformance) Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n Ivan Herman
• Re: FYI: RDFa extension to Semantic Media Wiki... Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: Handling rel="alternate stylesheet" KANZAKI Masahide
• FYI: RDFa extension to Semantic Media Wiki... Ivan Herman
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n Ivan Herman
• Handling rel="alternate stylesheet" Masataka Yakura
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n Philip Taylor

Wednesday, 16 September 2009

• Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 17 September 2009 Mark Birbeck
• Telecon Agenda - Thursday 17 September 2009 Ben Adida
• Re: HTML+RDFa (3.1 Document Conformance) Mark Birbeck
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n Ben Adida
• Re: Testing Google's Rich Snippets RDFa support Mark Birbeck
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n Philip Taylor
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n Manu Sporny
• Re: HTML+RDFa (3.1 Document Conformance) Manu Sporny
• Re: Testing Google's Rich Snippets RDFa support Philip Taylor
• Re: Testing Google's Rich Snippets RDFa support Toby Inkster
• Re: Testing Google's Rich Snippets RDFa support Philip Taylor
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n Ivan Herman
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n Philip Taylor
• HTML+RDFa (3.1 Document Conformance) Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• CURIE spec error reports Steven Pemberton
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n Ivan Herman
• Re: Testing Google's Rich Snippets RDFa support Toby Inkster
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• head/@profile, profile link relation, was: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Julian Reschke
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Manu Sporny
• Addition to XHTML+RDFa errata document (URI mappings) Manu Sporny

Tuesday, 15 September 2009

• Re: Testing Google's Rich Snippets RDFa support Philip Taylor

Saturday, 12 September 2009

• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Jeni Tennison
• Testing Google's Rich Snippets RDFa support Philip Taylor
• Re: Minor remarks on the RDFa specs Mark Birbeck
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Shane McCarron
• Minor remarks on the RDFa specs Stephane Corlosquet

Friday, 11 September 2009

• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Jeni Tennison
• RDFa test cases Jeni Tennison
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Shane McCarron
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Jeni Tennison
• Re: Errata text for RDFa Syntax section 5.5 step 2 Ivan Herman
• Re: Errata text for RDFa Syntax section 5.5 step 2 Shane McCarron
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Shane McCarron
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Shane McCarron
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Jeni Tennison
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Mark Birbeck
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Ivan Herman
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: Errata text for RDFa Syntax section 5.5 step 2 Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-236: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Ivan Herman
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Ivan Herman
• Re: Minutes of the RDFa TF, 2009-09- Ivan Herman
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Tore Eriksson

Thursday, 10 September 2009

• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Mark Birbeck
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Mark Birbeck
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Shane McCarron
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Shane McCarron
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Jeni Tennison
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Jeni Tennison
• Re: Minutes of the RDFa TF, 2009-09- Manu Sporny
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Shane McCarron
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Laurens Holst
• Minutes of the RDFa TF, 2009-09- Ivan Herman
• Errata text for RDFa Syntax section 5.5 step 2 Shane McCarron
• Telecon Agenda, Thursday 10 September 1500 UTC Ben Adida
• ISSUE-237: Better rdf:List support in RDFa 1.1 SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-236: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value SWD Issue Tracker

Wednesday, 9 September 2009

• Re: Things to note in recent HTML+RDFa draft Ivan Herman
• Things to note in recent HTML+RDFa draft Manu Sporny

Tuesday, 8 September 2009

• ISSUE-227 Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Shane McCarron
• Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value Shane McCarron
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Michael Hausenblas
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Shane McCarron
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Shane McCarron
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n Ivan Herman

Monday, 7 September 2009

• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n Philip Taylor
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n Ivan Herman
• XMLLiterals and c14n (was: HTML+RDFa (2nd draft)) Philip Taylor
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Henri Sivonen
• Re: Feature request for RDFa 1.1 [Fwd: rdf:Lists in RDFa?] Ivan Herman
• Re: Feature request for RDFa 1.1 [Fwd: rdf:Lists in RDFa?] Toby Inkster
• Re: Feature request for RDFa 1.1 [Fwd: rdf:Lists in RDFa?] Mark Birbeck
• Re: Feature request for RDFa 1.1 [Fwd: rdf:Lists in RDFa?] Ivan Herman
• HTML+RDFa (2nd draft) Manu Sporny

Saturday, 5 September 2009

• Re: Feature request for RDFa 1.1 [Fwd: rdf:Lists in RDFa?] Niklas Lindström
• Feature request for RDFa 1.1 [Fwd: rdf:Lists in RDFa?] Toby Inkster
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Toby Inkster
• Re: xhtml markup such as <strong> and <em> in RDFa values Toby Inkster
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Philip Taylor
• Re: xhtml markup such as <strong> and <em> in RDFa values Keith Alexander
• Re: xhtml markup such as <strong> and <em> in RDFa values Benjamin Melançon
• Re: xhtml markup such as <strong> and <em> in RDFa values Keith Alexander
• xhtml markup such as <strong> and <em> in RDFa values Benjamin Melançon

Friday, 4 September 2009

• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Jonas Sicking
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Shane McCarron
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Philip Taylor
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Henri Sivonen
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa James Graham
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Henri Sivonen

Thursday, 3 September 2009

• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Boris Zbarsky
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Shane McCarron
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Boris Zbarsky
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Shane McCarron
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Sam Ruby
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Sam Ruby
• Re: Proposed Wording Change - Processing step 9 Shane McCarron
• Re: Proposed Wording Change - Processing step 9 Toby Inkster
• Proposed Wording Change - Processing step 9 Shane McCarron
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Philip Taylor
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Shane McCarron
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Shane McCarron
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Sam Ruby
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Henri Sivonen
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Anne van Kesteren
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Henri Sivonen
• Re: Telecon Agenda - RDFa - Thursday 3 September, 1500 UTC Ivan Herman
• Telecon Agenda - RDFa - Thursday 3 September, 1500 UTC Ben Adida

Wednesday, 2 September 2009

• ISSUE-235: Proposal for allowing URIs in CURIE-only attributes SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-234: change default treatment of literals with markup SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-233: use other URI-carrying attributes in HTML+RDFa SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-232: errata for 4.1 document conformance SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-231: small errata: initializing the prefix mappings SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-230: @lang define behavior as per XHTML 1.1. SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-228: itsRules textual content wrong in vocab SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-227: undeclared prefix in @datatype SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-229: typo in RDFa test case 122 SWD Issue Tracker
• Re: HTML5 already includes RDFa David Wood
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: HTML5 already includes RDFa Manu Sporny
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Manu Sporny
• Errata for RDFa Section 5.5 Processing Rules Manu Sporny
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Manu Sporny
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Manu Sporny
• Re: Bug in XHTML Vocab document Steven Pemberton
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Smylers
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Anne van Kesteren
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Henri Sivonen
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Manu Sporny
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Manu Sporny
• Bug in XHTML Vocab document Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML5 already includes RDFa David Peterson
• Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Maciej Stachowiak

Tuesday, 1 September 2009

• FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Manu Sporny

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 20:22:44 UTC