Mark Birbeck wrote: > Hi Julian, > > Thanks for this. > > The changes I'm proposing do actually give us 'URIorCURIEorSafeCURIE' > everywhere. Ah, I missed the "...orSafeCURIE". > :) > > It's just that since a CURIE is /either/ a [CURIE] or a [safe CURIE], > I figured that using the name 'URIorCURIE' rather than > 'URIorCURIEorSafeCURIE', to represent this in the prose, would be > acceptable. > > In other words, the functionality is definitely as you describe -- > i.e., it is backwards-compatible -- it's just that the short name I've > used collapses the two types of CURIE into one, more general notion, > of a CURIE. > > But if there's a feeling that this might confuse people, and that we > should use the longer term, then I don't have a problem with that > either. > ... I was confused, so my assumption would be that others will be confused as well. Best regards, JulianReceived on Thursday, 26 November 2009 14:06:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:05 UTC