- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:05:28 +0100
- To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- CC: W3C RDFa task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Mark Birbeck wrote: > Hi Julian, > > Thanks for this. > > The changes I'm proposing do actually give us 'URIorCURIEorSafeCURIE' > everywhere. Ah, I missed the "...orSafeCURIE". > :) > > It's just that since a CURIE is /either/ a [CURIE] or a [safe CURIE], > I figured that using the name 'URIorCURIE' rather than > 'URIorCURIEorSafeCURIE', to represent this in the prose, would be > acceptable. > > In other words, the functionality is definitely as you describe -- > i.e., it is backwards-compatible -- it's just that the short name I've > used collapses the two types of CURIE into one, more general notion, > of a CURIE. > > But if there's a feeling that this might confuse people, and that we > should use the longer term, then I don't have a problem with that > either. > ... I was confused, so my assumption would be that others will be confused as well. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 26 November 2009 14:06:14 UTC