Re: Call for Review of XHTML Test Cases 158, 160, 162, 164

Manu Sporny wrote:
> This is a call for review for Test Cases 158, 160, 162 and 164. Keep in
> mind that each of these tests is a NEGATIVE test... meaning that no
> triples should be generated by any of these particular test documents.
> 
> Everybody is encouraged to review these test cases. Reviews are due by
> this coming Thursday, 1600 UTC.
> 
> The test cases can be found at the following URL:
> 
> http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/test-suite/
> 
> For "Test Suite", select: "XHTML+RDFa 1.0"
> For "Unit Test Status", select: "Unreviewed"
> 
> Here is a template to follow when responding:
> 
> TC158: approved/rejected/approved with modifications/needs discussion

Rejected; I would prefer to add the 'rdf' namespace to TC164 and keep it
there!

> TC160: approved/rejected/approved with modifications/needs discussion

Approve.

> TC162: approved/rejected/approved with modifications/needs discussion

Approve.

> TC164: approved/rejected/approved with modifications/needs discussion
> 

Approve, but... it may be crisper if the example used a real RDF term,
say, rdfs:comment.

Also, by adding 'rdf' to the list, this may make test #158 unnecessary.

> -- manu
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf