W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > November 2009

Newly approved TCs - 122, 123, 126, 131, 134 and 140

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:43:08 -0500
Message-ID: <4AFA32CC.6040604@digitalbazaar.com>
To: RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
The XHTML+RDFa test suite has been updated to include a number of test
cases that we've approved over the past 4 months (but I failed to mark
as approved until just now).

I vaguely recall us approving TCs 122, 123 and 126, but could not find a
record of us doing so. Those test cases pass at least 3 implementations
and there was nothing that jumped out at being invalid about those
tests. However, if somebody else could check them out and make sure I
didn't make a mistake, that would be great.

There is a clear record of TCs 131, 134 and 140 being approved.

We had said that TC 140 shouldn't generate the triple listed in the
SPARQL, but I can't remember why now (and it wasn't minuted). TC140 has
been published as a negative test, but Philip meant it to be a positive
test. Why should TC 140 not generate the triple listed in the SPARQL?

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Establishing an Open Digital Media Commerce Standard
http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2009/09/28/a-digital-content-commerce-standard/
Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2009 03:43:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:05 UTC