- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:31:24 -0500
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: RDFa Developers <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Well.... My thought is that we should ignore @lang always. The advice is that people who are writing content that needs to be portable to legacy user agents specify both. For RDFa that advice could be the same were we to update the RDFa spec to include @lang. However, I do not believe that @lang should influence the language associated with an XMLLiteral triple. Mark might have a different opinion, of course. Manu Sporny wrote: > KANZAKI, Masahide wrote (via Twitter): > >> _masaka hopes that RDFa spec will be revised to have lang attribute, >> since 2nd ed PER of XHTML 1.1 integrates it >> > > Search for "lang " in the 2nd edition XHTML 1.1 PER doc[1]. > > What are our thoughts on doing this eventually? Shane? > > -- manu > > [1] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/PER-xhtml-basic-20090206/ > > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Friday, 13 March 2009 18:32:11 UTC