W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > March 2009

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:15:07 +0100
Message-ID: <49AFFA8B.3060806@gmx.de>
To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org
Steven Pemberton wrote:
>> Yes. Using a safe-CURIE wouldn't have prevented that, but at least it 
>> wouldn't break URIs in rel values.
> Wait, you can't use URIs as rel values, because "next" is just as valid 
> a URI as "http://www.w3.org/foo". You would have to have a 'safe uri' 
> format such as "<next>" and "<http://www.w3.org/foo>" to make it 
> possible to interpret a rel directly as a URI.

The string "next" is a URI reference 
(<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc3986.html#rfc.section.4.1>), not a 
URI (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc3986.html#rfc.section.3>).

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 16:15:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:01 UTC