On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:09:46 +0100, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Ben Adida wrote: >> I think that's what Steven means when he says we added a way to >> interpret the @rel syntax without actually changing it, because there >> *no* syntax specified other than CDATA. Julian Reschke wrote: > And that's what is incorrect. *Because* the syntax is a plain string > it's an incompatible change to define a new syntax here. Keep in mind > that "foo:bar" already was a syntactically legal relation value before. Without a formally ascribed meaning. RDFa now formally ascribes meaning to it if you choose. Just like microformats ascribes meaning to some class values. Best wishes, StevenReceived on Thursday, 5 March 2009 12:18:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:01 UTC