- From: Rob Sayre <rsayre@mozilla.com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:28:47 -0500
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org
On 3/1/09 2:51 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: > This is pretty close to the current proposal floating around for > stuffing prefix to URI bindings into a non-xmlns attribute. Just it > involves tweaking the prose definition of data-* rather than adding a > new attribute. The CSS working group has a very good way of dealing with experimental things. Examples: -moz-box-pack -webkit-transition -o-table-baseline Using data-rdfa- isn't much different. It's certainly easier to get right than XML Namespaces, it's compatible with XHTML, and it doesn't step on the namespace that the HTML WG is chartered to standardize. For example, I don't see a "property" attribute in HTML5. - Rob
Received on Sunday, 1 March 2009 20:29:32 UTC