- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:59:10 +0000
- To: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Karl, > The same way creative commons could register urn:cc. I understand that > we loose a bit of the flexibility of namespaces by choosing whatever > prefix you want, BUT in the deployed markup, I have the feeling > (survey?), that people are using the same prefix values. Something like [1]? Some evidence of this method also found in [2]. However, I'm undecided re this proposal, frankly. Cheers, Michael [1] http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/resource/html/id/196/Most-common-RDF-namespaces [2] http://prefix.cc/ -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://sw-app.org/about.html http://webofdata.wordpress.com/ > From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net> > Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:50:39 -0500 > To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> > Cc: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark > Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa list > <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" > <www-tag@w3.org> > Subject: Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using > XMLNS in link/@rel > Resent-From: <www-tag@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:50:50 +0000 > > > Le 1 mars 2009 à 09:54, Henri Sivonen a écrit : >> Now, to put an actual technical proposal in here: >> >> I suggest changing RDFa to use full IRIs instead of CURIEs. Then, >> suggest making it a conformance requirement for rel in both text/ >> html and application/xhtml+xml that a rel token MUST NOT contain a >> colon or MUST be an absolute IRI and MUST NOT start with the string >> "http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/ >> ". Authors SHOULD NOT mint relation IRIs that differ only in case. > > > After discussing with henri this [morning (EST) on IRC][1], a possible > solution for solving the issue without creating too much hurdles for > authors and spec would be to use urn. > > urn:dc:title > > is a URI and as henri mentioned, "one could register a URI scheme for > dc". > > The same way creative commons could register urn:cc. I understand that > we loose a bit of the flexibility of namespaces by choosing whatever > prefix you want, BUT in the deployed markup, I have the feeling > (survey?), that people are using the same prefix values. > > That would avoid also long uris in the rel value which would be > burdensome for authors, and templates authors. > > > [1]: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20090301#l-83 > > -- > Karl Dubost > Montréal, QC, Canada > http://twitter.com/karlpro > >
Received on Sunday, 1 March 2009 16:00:11 UTC