- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:57:48 -0500
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- CC: Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Jeni Tennison wrote:
>
> Oh, and there are two test cases where rdfQuery's response is classed
> as a failure when I think it matches the expected triple. These are
> "Empty xmlns value" and "Empty xmlns value overriding non-empty". In
> both cases, the expected result is '<> <{BASE}#test> "Test".' and I
> think that's what rdfQuery generates (with {BASE} replaced by the base
> URI of the test case).
FWIW - RDFa requires the use of XML Namespaces 1.0, not 1.1. As a
result, I think that both of these tests are wrong. As Philip points
out, in XML Namespaces 1.0 an empty xmlns value is illegal, so such a
value MUST be ignored by an RDFa processor. My implementation does not
correctly do that, but I am updating it right now.
--
Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 4 June 2009 20:58:42 UTC