Re: PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral

• From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
• Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:35:15 -0700
• To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
• CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <4A71E7E3.5040902@adida.net>

Jeni Tennison wrote:
> Looking at the implementation report [1], specifically Test0011, it
> appears that seven of the nine implementations listed handle XMLLiteral
> with conformance to the current rules. I can tell you that rdfQuery is
> also conformant to RDFa 1.0 as currently specified.
> 
> So it's not exactly "the reality of implementations out there".

Okay, based on your comments and further discussion during the telecon
today, I am convinced. As small and useful as this change is, we should
abide by the process and rev the spec appropriately.

Shane is producing a proposed diff for this change.

Thanks for the feedback, as always!

-Ben

Received on Thursday, 30 July 2009 18:35:52 UTC