- From: Martin McEvoy <martin@weborganics.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:11:54 +0100
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- CC: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, RDFa TF list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hello Shane, Doug... Shane McCarron wrote: > I appreciate that we are talking about a new attribute here, but I > think we may have lost sight of what the attribute is *for*. What is > the purpose of this attribute? Is it for defining CURIE prefix > mappings to vocabularies? Im guessing its defining prefix-less mappings instead of property="foaf:name" it could be property="name" in both instances they would map to http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name, the problem I would say is how do you pass the prefixes and their mappings on to the parser without using xmlns:foaf="..." If it were possible, it would allow a microformats like markup, which in my view would be a whole lot more elegant and readable than the crufty, slightly over the top approach RDFa has now using xmlns, I cant help thinking every time I mark up RDFa how very dated it looks, I gave up using mark-up like style="color:green" a few years ago now, RDFa makes me feel like I am repeating the same mistake but much, much worse, I really dont think RDFa will last that long if we persist on using prefixes and xmlns, but maybe that's just me ;) Best Wishes Martin ..... > Is it for identifying the mapping to use when no prefix is used on a > CURIE? Is it for both? The name is important. But I think it is way > more important to define the scope of the functionality. > Doug Schepers wrote: >> Hi, Folks- >> >> Michael Hausenblas wrote (on 7/23/09 5:05 AM): >>>>> I'd suggest that @prefix is maybe not the best name for the >>>>> attribute -- >>>>> too focused on the mechanics of CURIE mapping. @vocab maybe? >>>> >>>> I like @vocab +1 from me ;) >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> @vocab makes indeed the most sense to me as well. It conveys the >>> message >>> 'here is a vocabulary from which I intend to use certain terms'. >> >> Yes, this is what I meant in my post as well... make it something >> that might be understood more easily by laymen. @vocab is an >> improvement, at least for english speakers. >> >> Regards- >> -Doug Schepers >> W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs > -- Martin McEvoy http://weborganics.co.uk/
Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 00:12:43 UTC