- From: Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:45:33 +0100
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
On 17 Jul 2009, at 20:05, Ben Adida wrote: > Ok, I definitely want this to be done in the *right* OWL way, but with > the least amount of complexity possible. For example, I'd like this to > be usable with the simplest variant of OWL. The simplest version of OWL that the OWL spec defines is "OWL Lite", and rdfs:subClassOf, rdfs:subPropertyOf, owl:equivalentClass and owl:equivalentProperty all work there. Of course, if you just use rdfs:subClassOf and rdfs:subPropertyOf, you don't need any OWL at all - RDFS reasoning is sufficient. <#Ben> myvocab:name "Ben" . myvocab:name rdfs:subPropertyOf foaf:name . is enough information to reason that the following is true: <#Ben> foaf:name "Ben" . -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Friday, 17 July 2009 20:44:39 UTC