- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:37:11 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote: > Nothing, except that the requirement to qualify new values with > @profile both was ignored by almost everybody (including RDFa!), and > also doesn't work in practice (as it doesn't help with disambiguation). Well.... I disagree there. RDFa DOES define a value for @profile. We just didn't require its use for some reason that is lost to me at the moment. Probably that someone objected that no one in the microformats community ever remembers to specify @profile, so why should we. As to disambiguation... yeah, I agree there. I think you just need to define precedence rules and leave it to common sense. That coupled with Sam's "SHOULD" text really ought to be sufficient. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 9 July 2009 17:38:24 UTC