- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:19:57 -0500
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Sam Ruby wrote: > My take: while it is possible to construct such examples, in practice > they would be rare enough to not be an issue. That being said, it is > nearly impossible to legislate against, as it would require people to > avoid declaring namespaces prefix that matches any current or future > URI scheme. Perhaps a "SHOULD avoid well known URI schemes" might be > in order. I like this. In fact, I am sure we used to have text like that. Not sure why it was removed, but +1 from me! -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2009 17:21:09 UTC