Friday, 31 July 2009
- xmlns in the HTML5 DOM (was Re: [DRAFT] Heartbeat poll)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: [DRAFT] Heartbeat poll
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- RE: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- RE: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
Thursday, 30 July 2009
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity -- the security angle
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500UTC
- Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500UTC
- Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500UTC
- Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500UTC
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
Wednesday, 29 July 2009
- Re: PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral
- Re: PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- Search Monkey and Bing deal?
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- Re: PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral
Tuesday, 28 July 2009
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- Re: PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral
- Re: PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral
Monday, 27 July 2009
Friday, 24 July 2009
Friday, 31 July 2009
Thursday, 23 July 2009
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- An Editor
- why not @profile? (Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity)
- Re: PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral
- PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral
- meeting record: 2009-07-23 RDF-in-XHTML Task Force telecon
- VoCamp, creating new vocabularies, Nice, France, 24th and 25th September 2009
- Re: telecon in < 1 hour
- Re: telecon in < 1 hour
- telecon in < 1 hour
- Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500UTC
- A New Way Forward for HTML5
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- Re: Please Don't Use the Name "@prefix"
Tuesday, 21 July 2009
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
Monday, 20 July 2009
- meeting record: 2009-07-16 RDF-in-XHTML Task Force telecon
- Re: Please Don't Use the Name "@prefix"
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- Re: Please Don't Use the Name "@prefix"
- Please Don't Use the Name "@prefix" (was: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity)
Friday, 17 July 2009
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- Re: xmlns in HTML5
- Re: xmlns in HTML5
- Re: xmlns in HTML5
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- Re: xmlns in HTML5
- Re: xmlns in HTML5
- Re: xmlns in HTML5
- Re: xmlns in HTML5
- Re: xmlns in HTML5
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: xmlns in HTML5
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: xmlns in HTML5
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: xmlns in HTML5
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- Re: link/@rel=profile, was: HTML5+RDFa first Editors Draft published
Thursday, 16 July 2009
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: link/@rel=profile, was: HTML5+RDFa first Editors Draft published
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- an alternative for microformat-like simplicity
- RDFa Community ToDo list
- Re: link/@rel=profile, was: HTML5+RDFa first Editors Draft published
- Re: link/@rel=profile, was: HTML5+RDFa first Editors Draft published
- meeting record: 2009-07-09 RDFa Task Force
- Re: xmlns in HTML5
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: xmlns in HTML5
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: xmlns in HTML5
- Re: xmlns in HTML5
- Re: xmlns in HTML5
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: xmlns in HTML5
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: xmlns in HTML5
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: Proposal for allowing URIs in CURIE-only attributes
- Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC)
- Re: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC
- Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC
Tuesday, 14 July 2009
- Re: link/@rel=profile, was: HTML5+RDFa first Editors Draft published
- link/@rel=profile, was: HTML5+RDFa first Editors Draft published
Monday, 13 July 2009
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- HTML5+RDFa first Editors Draft published
- Re: RDFa Bookmarklets as Firefox Ubiquity commands
- Re: Proposal for allowing URIs in CURIE-only attributes
Sunday, 12 July 2009
- Re: Proposal for allowing URIs in CURIE-only attributes
- Re: Fwd: [Wikitech-l] Proposal: switch to HTML 5
Saturday, 11 July 2009
- Re: [Wikitech-l] Proposal: switch to HTML 5
- Re: Fwd: [Wikitech-l] Proposal: switch to HTML 5
- Re: RDFa Bookmarklets as Firefox Ubiquity commands
- Fwd: [Wikitech-l] Proposal: switch to HTML 5
- RDFa Bookmarklets as Firefox Ubiquity commands
Friday, 10 July 2009
- Re: Proposal for allowing URIs in CURIE-only attributes
- Re: Use cases not addressed by HTML5 Microdata (was: Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG)
- Re: Proposal for allowing URIs in CURIE-only attributes
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Proposal for allowing URIs in CURIE-only attributes
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
Thursday, 9 July 2009
- Re: adding reification ids
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Re: adding reification ids
- Re: Re: adding reification ids
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: adding reification ids
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: adding reification ids
- adding reification ids
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Use cases not addressed by HTML5 Microdata (was: Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG)
- Re: telecon
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500UTC
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
Wednesday, 8 July 2009
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- telecon
- Re: [Wikitech-l] Proposal: switch to HTML 5
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Re: Henri's RDFa statements in the XHTML2 FAQ
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG
- Re: Getting access to HTML WG CVS [was: Henri's RDFa statements in the XHTML2 FAQ]
- About producing HTML WG drafts [was: Henri's RDFa statements in the XHTML2 FAQ]
- Getting access to HTML WG CVS [was: Henri's RDFa statements in the XHTML2 FAQ]
- Re: Henri's RDFa statements in the XHTML2 FAQ
- Re: Henri's RDFa statements in the XHTML2 FAQ
Tuesday, 7 July 2009
- Re: Henri's RDFa statements in the XHTML2 FAQ
- Henri's RDFa statements in the XHTML2 FAQ
- ISSUE-225: [editorial] typo in Abstract / Synopsis
- ISSUE-224: prefLabel language tag examples non-conformant to BCP 47
Thursday, 2 July 2009
- Minutes for RDFa Task Force (June 25th, 2009)
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)
- HTML+RDFa Issues (update)