Re: Non-XHTML host languages for RDFa

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:39:11 +0100, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>  
wrote:

>
>
> Steven Pemberton wrote:
>>
>> In chatting with Ivan, I favour something like:
>>     take the applicable namespace
>>     append "/vocab#"
>>     use that as the missing prefix.
> In my opinion, something like this would only serve to extend the  
> confusion between namespaces and vocabularies.  Indeed, we have  
> purposely avoided doing ANYTHING with the XML default namespace because  
> it can change throughout a document.  Are you suggesting that the  
> collection of  'keywords' could morph magically as an XML parser moves  
> through its content?

That's the current state of play if you have some SVG in the middle of  
some XHTML. SVG defines a different set of keywords to XHTML.

Steven