- From: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:54:09 +0100
- To: "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>, "Steven Pemberton" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Cc: "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>, "Toby Inkster" <tai@g5n.co.uk>, "RDFa Developers" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:39:11 +0100, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > > > Steven Pemberton wrote: >> >> In chatting with Ivan, I favour something like: >> take the applicable namespace >> append "/vocab#" >> use that as the missing prefix. > In my opinion, something like this would only serve to extend the > confusion between namespaces and vocabularies. Indeed, we have > purposely avoided doing ANYTHING with the XML default namespace because > it can change throughout a document. Are you suggesting that the > collection of 'keywords' could morph magically as an XML parser moves > through its content? That's the current state of play if you have some SVG in the middle of some XHTML. SVG defines a different set of keywords to XHTML. Steven
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 13:55:08 UTC