Monday, 31 August 2009
Thursday, 27 August 2009
- Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens?
- Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens?
- Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens?
- Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens?
- Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens?
- Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens?
- Re: Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 August 2009, 1500 UTC
- Re: Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 August 2009, 1500 UTC
- Re: Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 August 2009, 1500 UTC
- Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 August 2009, 1500 UTC
Wednesday, 26 August 2009
Monday, 24 August 2009
- Re: RDFa usage for SKOS applications
- Re: RDFa usage for SKOS applications
- RDFa usage for SKOS applications
Friday, 21 August 2009
Thursday, 20 August 2009
- RDFa telecon minutes for August 20th, 2009
- typo in RDFa test case 122 (I think)
- Re: Telecon Agenda- 20 August 2009, 1500 UTC
- Telecon Agenda- 20 August 2009, 1500 UTC
Wednesday, 19 August 2009
Tuesday, 18 August 2009
Monday, 17 August 2009
Sunday, 16 August 2009
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: microdata feedback
Saturday, 15 August 2009
Friday, 14 August 2009
- Re: microdata feedback
- RDFa telecon minutes for August, 13th, 2009
- Re: microdata feedback / Was: Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: microdata feedback / Was: Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: microdata feedback / Was: Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
Thursday, 13 August 2009
- ANN: RDF2RDFa: Turning RDF/XML into Snippets for Copy-and-Paste
- Re: microdata feedback
- Re: microdata feedback
- regrets [Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500 UTC]
- Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections)
- Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections)
- Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections)
- Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections)
- Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections)
- Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections)
- Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections)
- Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections)
- more microdata feedback (and corrections)
Wednesday, 12 August 2009
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used
- Re: Possible RDFa errata - 4.1 Document Conformance
- Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500 UTC
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used
- The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
Tuesday, 11 August 2009
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Minutes for August 6th, 2009 telecon
- microdata feedback / Was: Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
Saturday, 8 August 2009
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
Friday, 7 August 2009
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: [whatwg] Microdata Revisited
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
Thursday, 6 August 2009
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Test results for xmlns:foo attribute preservation across all browsers
- Re: Test results for xmlns:foo attribute preservation across all browsers
- Re: [whatwg] Test results for xmlns:foo attribute preservation across all browsers
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Test results for xmlns:foo attribute preservation across all browsers
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Test results for xmlns:foo attribute preservation across all browsers
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Loading tokens via @profile and XMLHttpRequest issues
- Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500 UTC
- Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500 UTC
- Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500 UTC
- Loading tokens via @profile and XMLHttpRequest issues
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
Wednesday, 5 August 2009
- Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
Tuesday, 4 August 2009
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
- Re: New HTML5 spec-editing tools released
- Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon
Monday, 3 August 2009
- Re: New HTML5 spec-editing tools released
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)
- New HTML5 spec-editing tools released
- Microdata Revisited