- From: SWD Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:34:25 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org,public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
ISSUE-134: Last Call Comment: owl:inverseOf http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/134 Raised by: Alistair Miles On product: SKOS Raised by Michael Schneider in [1]: """ Don't say "is /the/ owl:inverseOf ...". In OWL Full, a property p may have two inverses q1 and q2 with q1 owl:differentFrom q2. For q1 and q2, in order to be both inverse of p, it suffices that q1 owl:equivalentProperty q2 holds, i.e. that q1 and q2 only have the same property extension, they don't have to be the same resource. Better say "is owl:inverseOf". Same for S25, S26, S43. Please check yourself whether I have missed some occurrence. """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Sep/0044.html
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2008 11:35:02 UTC