- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:03:13 -0400
- To: Toby A Inkster <mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
- CC: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, andy.seaborne@hp.com
Toby A Inkster wrote: > Manu Sporny wrote: >> Shane McCarron spotted this bug in the SPARQL.org implementation while >> running his RDFa processor against the RDFa test suite[1]. > > Who did? ;-) > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Aug/0021.html Heh, woops - sorry Toby, I completely missed that e-mail from you. BTW, Toby - I finally published an updated version of the Audio RDF and Media RDF vocabulary that cites your contributions to them: http://purl.org/media/audio#contributors http://purl.org/media/#contributors > Ralph Swick tracked down a reference in the RDF Concepts and Abstract > Syntax which says that for the purposes of RDF, two URIs are only > considered equivalent if they are the same, compared character by > character as Unicode strings. Hmm... that's a bit strange. Anybody know the thought process behind that decision? For example, that would mean that this: http://example.org/ and this HTTP://example.org/ while being canonically the same, would fail in any sort of RDF-based comparison? -- manu -- Manu Sporny President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Bitmunk 3.0 Website Launches http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2008/07/03/bitmunk-3-website-launches
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2008 21:03:54 UTC