- From: Martin McEvoy <martin@weborganics.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:20:20 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hello all Please forget any of my proposals for making RDFa more Microformats aware, It will never work, Last question If its such a disaster using a single property from RDFa @content, why is it NOT a disaster when it comes to re-using a whole Microformats vocabulary in RDFa. http://microformats.org/wiki/haudio. Manu Sporny wrote: > Martin McEvoy wrote: > >>> If there are "hacks", please enlighten me because I am unaware of there >>> being any and I would certainly want to fix them if they exist. >>> >>> >> I don't think you can Manu. The damage has been done already. >> > > So, this discussion has taken a rather nasty turn: > > http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-new/2008-September/001800.html > > I'm removing myself from the discussion since the poster has become > overly aggressive and is currently attempting to crucify me in the > Microformats community. > Yup Me too this discussion does not belong here For the interest of this community seeing as Manu here has neglected to tell you all Here Is an email I sent to him earlier this evening > This is off list Manu > > Martin McEvoy wrote: >> Manu Sporny wrote: >>> Martin McEvoy wrote: >>> >>>> Talking of "hacks" why is this NOT a "hack" : >>>> http://wiki.digitalbazaar.com/en/HAudio_RDFa? it looks like a >>>> direct rip >>>> from the Microformats wiki, >>>> >>> >>> That's because it started out as a direct rip from the Microformats >>> wiki >>> >> it still is >>> - the fact that it is so close to hAudio was deliberate. The intention >>> was to create a cross-community vocabulary that would work for people >>> jumping between RDFa and Microformats. >> what people? hAudio is not yet even a draft proposal, and all these >> Publisher were Jumping around between vocabularies, that's >> interesting show me where? >>> The outcome of that research was >>> this: >>> >> By the W3C, the Microformats Community...? >>> http://purl.org/media/audio >>> >>> The Audio RDF Vocabulary above has a clean/direct mapping to/from >>> Microformats hAudio. >>> > Yo may be wandering about all the retaliation about "audio rdfa" Manu > when you Microformats New mailing list with hAudio RDFa you received > little support for your endeavour, in fact it was explicitly stated that: > >> --- this is one of the things that microformats wants to prevent... >> > http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-new/2007-July/000716.html > > > basically because it causes a "drift" in semantics. you received no > feedback from the list because we didn't want you to do it. you read > Brian's email right? it was an incidental concern. > > It goes a little further than that, basically Manu You ripped the > hAudio Microformat against the wishes of the Microformats Community > and thus seriously damaged the haudio process in fact you almost > killed it dead. if I could have stopped you I would. lets get hAudio > out the door first eh! > > I request that you refrain from Editing the hAudio wiki further until > I can be sure you are not serving your own needs. > > I cant believe you became an invited expert over your efforts. how did > you deserve that. > > I will be adding Myself as Editor on the Version 1.0 format, because > I don't have some other agenda other than completing haudio. > > Manu If you Ignore this email like you seem to conveniently do, I will > post this email to the list because I think you will be ignoring me > and I really would like some answers this time publicly or privately . > > Best Wishes > > Martin McEvoy I later added after: > Martin McEvoy wrote: >> I will be adding Myself as Editor on the Version 1.0 format, because >> I don't have some other agenda other than completing haudio. > In fact forget that its not very diplomatic, I will Invite Tantek, or > Brian to edit the 1.0 version of hAudio they are the two admin's that > have had the most input in haudio, haudio may gain a little of its > credibility in this way, and I think that it is the best. > > I will be emailing the admin's airing your total disregard of > microformat's principles, and of the damage you are causing the > Microformats Community, in particular hAudio > http://microformats.org/wiki/haudio and currency > http://microformats.org/wiki/currency to which you had no hand in > authoring. > > I will CC you the email in the next few days. > > > Kind Regards > > Martin McEvoy > -- manu > >
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2008 01:21:04 UTC