- From: Martin McEvoy <martin@weborganics.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:57:21 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Manu Sporny wrote: > Martin McEvoy wrote: > >> Talking of "hacks" why is this NOT a "hack" : >> http://wiki.digitalbazaar.com/en/HAudio_RDFa? it looks like a direct rip >> from the Microformats wiki, >> > > That's because it started out as a direct rip from the Microformats wiki > it still is > - the fact that it is so close to hAudio was deliberate. The intention > was to create a cross-community vocabulary that would work for people > jumping between RDFa and Microformats. what people? hAudio is not yet even a draft proposal, and all these Publisher were Jumping around between vocabularies, that's interesting show me where? > The outcome of that research was > this: > By the W3C, the Microformats Community...? > http://purl.org/media/audio > > The Audio RDF Vocabulary above has a clean/direct mapping to/from > Microformats hAudio. > So you say... > The hAudio RDFa specification was replaced by the Audio RDF Vocabulary > several months ago. I have added a note to the page you linked to in > order to make that decision more clear and highlight the historical > nature of that document[1]. > If there are "hacks", please enlighten me because I am unaware of there > being any and I would certainly want to fix them if they exist. > > I don't think you can Manu. The damage has been done already. >> RDFa is Behaving a little like "The Borg" dont you think, "You will be >> assimilated" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borg_(Star_Trek) :-) >> > > Best wishes Martin
Received on Monday, 15 September 2008 19:58:05 UTC