- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:13:45 +0200
- To: Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Toby A Inkster wrote: > RDFa is "just" a representation of RDF. And microformats can already be > parsed as RDF - that's the point of GRDDL. Despite the fact that XSLT is > a horrible, horrible abomination, I think that GRDDL, not RDFa, is > probably the best hope for bringing microformats into the "upper case > Semantic Web". > > I believe Microformats and RDFa can happily co-exist. They both have > different syntaxes, but once you've converted them both to the abstract > RDF model, you can use pretty simple rules to combine the data from > each. The aim to strive towards should be: different syntaxes, separate > parsing models, but at the end one data model. That's exactly my view too. I guess in practice we'll also need an "HTML Tidy" step to get things into a GRDDL-ready markup. cheers, Dan -- http://danbri.org/
Received on Friday, 12 September 2008 10:14:24 UTC