- From: Martin McEvoy <martin@weborganics.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:36:52 +0100
- To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Hello All.. Some time ago I asked can I use non RDF vocablaries in RDFa such as Microformats without using Prefixes / namespaces see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Aug/0081.html. I did not ask the Microformats Community this question because there would have been little or No feedback which is as expected Microformats intentionally go out of their way to solve the simplest problem which is Vocabulary not really like RDFa which is Syntax the principles and rules for constructing Vocabularies, two different things. I received an un-inspiring response from the RDFa community, which surprised me a little because later that month it was part of the Agenda at the following Telecon meeting on the 28th of that month http://www.w3.org/2008/08/28-rdfa-minutes.html#item03. I wish I could be part of those meetings I would have explained further. So now I will :-) My response would have been *If* the RDFa community decided that Microformats are expressing semantics( which is Acknowledged ) and should be somehow ported to RDFa, Microformats do this using mainly using just Class attributes If you are going to "bring them to the fold" @class should be added to RDFa as one of its properties. Currently @class expresses little semantics in HTML even in microformats this is true without metadata profiles. RDFa has the most excellent opportunity to change all this in a very simple way @class will only generate a triple if it is using a pre defined value listed on http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-classes, because all existing and future microformats will generally use class names listed on that page, re-use existing microformats is part of the principles of microformats and that page hardly ever changes, All existing Microformated pages, Millions of them, could then potentially become part of RDFa in that way almost instantly and So Supporting Microformats in the best way and not *breaking* them. I really do Like RDFa It is an easy syntax once you get used to it and understand that you don't have to mark up your entire web page in RDFa just little bits will do. I believe that RDFa well be a popular markup language, especialy now Internet Explorer 8 supports XHTML now (at last) publishers eventually will not have a problem with application/xhtml+xml in fact it will be cool I think! Best Wishes Martin McEvoy
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2008 22:37:34 UTC