Re: Test Case #116 (v2): XML Entities must be supported by RDFa parser

OK. I'll keep looking at the cases anyway ;)

          Sergey


On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>wrote:

> Sergey Chernyshev wrote:
> > I'm not sure if this test is testing for a full list of entities,
> > although I don't know what it should be limited to.
>
> Hi Sergey, thanks for taking a look at the test cases. It's always good
> to have one more set of eyes on them. :)
>
> The test isn't meant to be an exhaustive test of XML Entities. Rather,
> TC116 is a hint to application developers that both normal, decimal and
> hexadecimal XML Entities are expected to be translated correctly by the
> RDFa parser. If somebody wanted to write a more thorough XML Entities
> test, that would be nice, but it should cover every
> non-decimal/non-hexadecimal XML Entity.
>
> I believe Toby answered your other question - we identified that the
> title of TC116 was incorrect during the telecon
>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/11/20-rdfa-minutes.html#item02
>
> and a correction was posted to that TC on the mailing list:
>
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Nov/0040.html
>
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny
> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>
> blog: POSIX Threads Don't Scale Past 100K Concurrent Web Requests
> http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2008/09/30/scaling-webservices-part-1
>
> blog: Fibers are the Future: Scaling Past 100K Concurrent Web Requests
> http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2008/10/21/scaling-webservices-part-2
>



-- 
Sergey Chernyshev
http://www.sergeychernyshev.com/