- From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:54:07 +0000
- To: "Ed Summers" <ehs@pobox.com>
- Cc: "SWD Working SWD" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
On 20 Nov 2008, at 13:38, Ed Summers wrote: > (cross-posting to public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf) > > Hi Sean: > > I ran your RDFa-ized version of the SKOS Reference through the RDFa > validator and it seemed to cough on the use of the 'name' attribute on > one of the <a> elements [1]. > > Validating with xmllint produces a whole slew of these 'name' > attribute errors. But interestingly it is silent about the use of the > 'name' attribute in anchor tags in the previous XHTML version. > > If you happen to have xmllint installed you can see this by comparing > the output of validating the XHTML version: > > xmllint --noout --valid http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-skos- > reference-20080829/ > > with the RDFa version: > > xmllint --noout --valid http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/ > reference/20081001/ > > I started to wonder if the referenced RDFa DTD [3] is missing a > definition for the 'name' attribute on the <a> element...but my DTD > skills are at an all time low. Perhaps I'm doing something wrong > here...or xmlint isn't all that it's cracked up to be. But xmllint and > the w3c validator seem to basically be in agreement. > > //Ed Hmmm. No idea I'm afraid! I just took the existing doc, changed the DTD and added some markup. The name attributes were there in the original and didn't seem to cause problems, so I suspect this may be something up with the DTD. And my DTD skillz are pretty minimal too.... Sean -- Sean Bechhofer School of Computer Science University of Manchester sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer
Received on Thursday, 20 November 2008 13:53:52 UTC