public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from March 2008 by date

Monday, 31 March 2008

• Re: new Primer Ben Adida
• Re: new Primer Ivan Herman
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= Mark Birbeck
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= Dan Brickley
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= Dan Brickley
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= Mark Birbeck
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= Ivan Herman
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= Ivan Herman
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= Dan Brickley
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= Ivan Herman
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= Mark Birbeck
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= Mark Birbeck
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= Daniel Renfer
• foaf:sha1 property with img src= Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFa spotlight plug-in Karl Dubost
• Re: LC comment: Don't discriminate against "useless" triples Dan Brickley
• RE: Crazy Ivan can now generate EARL Reports Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: RDFa spotlight plug-in Karl Dubost
• RDFa spotlight plug-in Karl Dubost
• LC comment: clarify situation around document fragments containing RDFa Micah Dubinko
• LC comment: Don't discriminate against "useless" triples Micah Dubinko
• LC comment: describe the algorithm in functional terms too Micah Dubinko
• LC comment: XSLT and conformance levels Micah Dubinko
• Re: Crazy Ivan can now generate EARL Reports Manu Sporny

Sunday, 30 March 2008

• RE: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011) Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011) Johannes Koch
• RE: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011) Hausenblas, Michael
• RE: new Primer Hausenblas, Michael

Saturday, 29 March 2008

• Re: new Primer Cindy Sue Causey
• new Primer Ben Adida
• Re: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011) Johannes Koch
• RE: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011) Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011) Johannes Koch

Friday, 28 March 2008

• Re: Progress on the RDFa GRDDL transform Simone Onofri
• Re: Progress on the RDFa GRDDL transform Fabien Gandon
• Re: request for extension to review RDFa Last Call. Ben Adida
• Re: request for extension to review RDFa Last Call. Al Gilman
• Re: request for extension to review RDFa Last Call. Shane McCarron
• Re: request for extension to review RDFa Last Call. Mark Birbeck
• RE: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011) Hausenblas, Michael
• RE: request for extension to review RDFa Last Call. Gottfried Zimmermann
• RE: Progress on the RDFa GRDDL transform Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: request for extension to review RDFa Last Call. Ben Adida
• request for extension to review RDFa Last Call. Al Gilman
• Re: Progress on the RDFa GRDDL transform Ivan Herman
• Progress on the RDFa GRDDL transform Fabien Gandon
• QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011) Johannes Koch
• QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011 Johannes Koch
• [RDFa TC] Updates as of 2008-03-27 telecon Hausenblas, Michael
• RE: Crazy Ivan can now generate EARL Reports Hausenblas, Michael
• Crazy Ivan can now generate EARL Reports Manu Sporny
• Meeting record: 2008-03-27 RDF-in-XHTML Task Force telecon Manu Sporny

Thursday, 27 March 2008

• Re: Different results of different RDFa extractors Mark Birbeck
• Different results of different RDFa extractors Sébastien Laborie
• RE: Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 March 2008, 1500 UTC == *EUROPE* still one hour earlier Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 March 2008, 1500 UTC == *EUROPE* still one hour earlier Simone Onofri

Wednesday, 26 March 2008

• Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 March 2008, 1500 UTC == *EUROPE* still one hour earlier Ben Adida
• RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! David Peterson
• RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! David Peterson
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! Ben Adida
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! Karl Dubost

Tuesday, 25 March 2008

• RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! Martin McEvoy
• RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! David Peterson
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! Manu Sporny
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! Ben Adida
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! Mark Birbeck
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! Shane McCarron
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! Manu Sporny
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! Elias Torres
• RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! David Peterson
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! Ben Adida
• Re: Is there any way to exclude prefixes from results? Martin McEvoy
• RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! David Peterson
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! Shane McCarron
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! Ivan Herman
• [RDFa TC] update Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: ISSUE-97: resolution from last week Johannes Koch
• Community outreach with a cheat sheet! David Peterson
• librdfa 0.10.1 - Windows headers/binaries available Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-97: resolution from last week Ben Adida
• Re: Is there any way to exclude prefixes from results? Ben Adida

Monday, 24 March 2008

• Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML Syntax draft Mark Birbeck
• Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML Syntax draft Ben Adida
• Re: Reviewing Last Call RDFa Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML Syntax draft Laurens Holst
• Replace @instanceof with @kind Elias Torres
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Elias Torres
• Re: Updated distiller plus some new tests Elias Torres
• Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML Syntax draft Mark Birbeck
• Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML Syntax draft Mark Birbeck
• Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML Syntax draft Johannes Koch

Sunday, 23 March 2008

• Comments on RDFa in XHTML Syntax draft Laurens Holst
• Re: Request extension for last call comments Ben Adida

Saturday, 22 March 2008

• Re: Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa James Pickering
• Re: Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa Shane McCarron
• Re: Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa James Pickering

Friday, 21 March 2008

• Re: Reviewing Last Call RDFa Shane McCarron
• Re: Reviewing Last Call RDFa Danny Ayers
• LC comment: Ambiguous "otherwise" step Micah Dubinko
• LC comment: missing summary text Micah Dubinko
• Request extension for last call comments Micah Dubinko
• Re: Reviewing Last Call RDFa Ben Adida
• Re: New web app to automatically mark up sites with RDFa Micah Dubinko
• Reviewing Last Call RDFa Tim Berners-Lee
• RE: New web app to automatically mark up sites with RDFa David Peterson
• Re: New web app to automatically mark up sites with RDFa Ben Adida
• Comments on "RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing" Jonathan Rees
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Martin McEvoy
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Shane McCarron
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Martin McEvoy
• Re: Updated distiller plus some new tests Ivan Herman
• RE: Updated distiller plus some new tests Hausenblas, Michael
• Updated distiller plus some new tests Ivan Herman
• New web app to automatically mark up sites with RDFa David Peterson
• Re: super easy issues: ISSUE-93, ISSUE-94, ISSUE-95 Ben Adida
• Re: ISSUE-96 Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Karl Dubost

Thursday, 20 March 2008

• Is there any way to exclude prefixes from results? Martin McEvoy
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Martin McEvoy
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Shane McCarron
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Ben Adida
• meeting record: 2008-03-20 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon Ralph R. Swick
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Elias Torres
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Dan Brickley
• RE: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed David Peterson
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 Ivan Herman
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 Mark Birbeck
• Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221 Ben Adida
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 Ivan Herman
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 Manu Sporny
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Shane McCarron
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 Ivan Herman
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 Mark Birbeck
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Mark Birbeck
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 Ivan Herman
• Re: markup stripping with @datatype Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: garbage collecting "useless" triples doesn't seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: garbage collecting "useless" triples doesn't seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: garbage collecting "useless" triples doesn't seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 Mark Birbeck
• Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221 Johannes Koch
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: garbage collecting "useless" triples doesn't seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa Ivan Herman
• Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221 Johannes Koch
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 Johannes Koch
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 Ivan Herman
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 Ivan Herman
• RE: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: garbage collecting "useless" triples doesn't seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa Micah Dubinko
• Re: markup stripping with @datatype Elias Torres
• Re: markup stripping with @datatype Ben Adida
• Re: Meeting Agenda, *UPDATED* Ben Adida
• ISSUE-102: Last Call Comment: Better name than \'instanceof\' is needed SWD Issue Tracker
• Meeting Agenda, Thursday 1500 UTC, still an hour early for Europeans Ben Adida
• ISSUE-101: Last Call Comment: garbage collecting \"useless\" triples doesn\'t seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-100: Last Call Comment: Bug in Step 11 of Processing rules, as evidenced by Test Case 58 SWD Issue Tracker
• RDFa Last Call Comment: garbage collecting "useless" triples doesn't seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa Ben Adida
• ISSUE-99: Last Call Comment: Editorial Bug in @src example mistaken in Section 5.3 SWD Issue Tracker
• Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221 Ben Adida
• Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221 Ben Adida
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Daniel E. Renfer

Wednesday, 19 March 2008

• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 Mark Birbeck
• Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed John Boyer
• RE: The Self-Describing Web Hausenblas, Michael
• The Self-Describing Web Steven Pemberton
• Re: Wrong link in RDFa Primer announcement Ivan Herman
• Wrong link in RDFa Primer announcement Johannes Koch

Monday, 17 March 2008

• Re: Topbraid supports RDFa Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 18 March 2008

• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Micah Dubinko
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed John Boyer
• Re: Fuzzbot - A Semantic Web Processor for Firefox Manu Sporny
• RE: Fuzzbot - A Semantic Web Processor for Firefox Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: Fuzzbot - A Semantic Web Processor for Firefox Ivan Herman
• Fuzzbot - A Semantic Web Processor for Firefox Manu Sporny
• Re: test suite in JavaScript thanks to Elias Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Ivan Herman
• test suite in JavaScript thanks to Elias Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed Micah Dubinko
• Re: Last Call compliant implementation Manu Sporny
• Processing Step 10 Elias Torres
• markup stripping with @datatype Elias Torres
• Re: Last Call compliant implementation Elias Torres

Monday, 17 March 2008

• RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed John Boyer
• Last Call processing in XSLT Micah Dubinko
• Re: [RDFa Wiki] issues and feature request Ben Adida
• SitePoint article on RDFa for next gen search engines David Peterson
• Yahoo!, Bibleref, and RDFa Steven Pemberton
• [RDFa Wiki] issues and feature request Hausenblas, Michael

Sunday, 16 March 2008

• Re: Community outreach Mark Birbeck
• Re: Community outreach Ben Adida
• Re: Community outreach Shane McCarron
• Community outreach David Peterson
• ISSUE-98: URI escaping in SPARQL query in Recipe 6 SWD Issue Tracker

Saturday, 15 March 2008

• ANNOUNCE: a new RDFa mailing list for web publishers. Ben Adida
• Re: librdfa implementation updated to Last Call processing rules Ben Adida

Friday, 14 March 2008

• RE: Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa David Peterson
• Re: Crazy Ivan (RDFa Test Harness) upgrade Manu Sporny
• Re: new list request [was: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section)] Ralph R. Swick
• Re: Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa Ben Adida
• Re: Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa Shane McCarron
• Re: Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa Ivan Herman
• Re: Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa Shane McCarron
• Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa David Peterson
• Re: Crazy Ivan (RDFa Test Harness) upgrade Ivan Herman
• librdfa implementation updated to Last Call processing rules Manu Sporny
• Crazy Ivan (RDFa Test Harness) upgrade Manu Sporny
• Re: Yahoo to support Semantic Web Manu Sporny

Thursday, 13 March 2008

• RE: Yahoo to support Semantic Web David Peterson
• RE: Yahoo to support Semantic Web David Peterson
• Yahoo to support Semantic Web Manu Sporny
• meeting record: 2008-03-13 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon Ralph R. Swick
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 87 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 87 Ivan Herman
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 87 Ivan Herman
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 87 Mark Birbeck
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 87 Mark Birbeck
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 87 Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa wiki Nathan Yergler
• Re: RDFa wiki Steven Pemberton
• Re: What is the correct set of triples for this case? Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa wiki Nathan Yergler
• Re: RDFa wiki Steven Pemberton
• Re: RDFa wiki Nathan Yergler
• Possible solutions for ISSUE 87 Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa wiki Steven Pemberton
• Re: update on RDFa wiki Dan Brickley
• Re: What is the correct set of triples for this case? Micah Dubinko
• Telecon Agenda, Thursday 13 March, *1500* UTC Ben Adida
• update on RDFa wiki Ben Adida

Wednesday, 12 March 2008

• RE: RDFa wiki David Peterson
• ISSUE-1: Test on a closed ISSUE Simon J. Hernandez
• Re: What is the correct set of triples for this case? Mark Birbeck
• Re: What is the correct set of triples for this case? Daniel E. Renfer
• Re: What is the correct set of triples for this case? Mark Birbeck
• Re: What is the correct set of triples for this case? Micah Dubinko
• Re: What is the correct triples for this case? Mark Birbeck
• What is the correct triples for this case? Micah Dubinko
• ISSUE-6 related to ISSUE-97? Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa wiki copyright Ben Adida
• RDFa wiki copyright Mike Linksvayer
• Re: RDFa wiki Manu Sporny
• Re: RDFa wiki Nathan Yergler
• Re: RDFa wiki Manu Sporny
• Re: RDFa wiki Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa wiki Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa wiki Nathan Yergler
• Re: Topbraid supports RDFa Manu Sporny
• Re: RDFa wiki Manu Sporny
• Re: RDFa wiki Nathan Yergler
• Re: RDFa wiki Manu Sporny
• RE: RDFa wiki Hausenblas, Michael
• Topbraid supports RDFa Steven Pemberton
• Re: Yahoo microsearch looking at RDFa, too Mark Birbeck
• RE: Yahoo microsearch looking at RDFa, too Hausenblas, Michael
• Yahoo microsearch looking at RDFa, too Ivan Herman
• RE: RDFa wiki Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: RDFa wiki Ben Adida
• RE: RDFa wiki Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: RDFa wiki Simone Onofri
• Re: RDFa wiki Manu Sporny

Tuesday, 11 March 2008

• RDFa wiki Ben Adida
• Re: Primer WD approved Mark Birbeck
• Primer WD approved Ben Adida
• Re: Last Call compliant implementation Manu Sporny
• Re: Last Call compliant implementation Ivan Herman
• [RDFa TC] interpretation of TC results - now implemented Hausenblas, Michael

Monday, 10 March 2008

• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) Mark Birbeck
• RE: Last Call compliant implementation Hausenblas, Michael
• Last Call compliant implementation Micah Dubinko
• For Consideration: rapid approval of small updates the RDFa Primer Ben Adida
• Re: RDF/XML and CURIEs Ivan Herman
• RE: RDF/XML and CURIEs Misha Wolf
• Re: RDF/XML and CURIEs Shane McCarron
• Re: RDF/XML and CURIEs Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF/XML and CURIEs Mark Birbeck
• RDF/XML and CURIEs Shane McCarron
• Re: Relationship between RDFa spec and CURIE spec Mark Birbeck
• Re: Question about @src handling Mark Birbeck

Sunday, 9 March 2008

• Question about @src handling Micah Dubinko
• Relationship between RDFa spec and CURIE spec Micah Dubinko

Monday, 10 March 2008

• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) Nathan Yergler
• Re: What format must an RDFa extractor service emit? Manu Sporny

Sunday, 9 March 2008

• Re: What format must an RDFa extractor service emit? Simone Onofri
• What format must an RDFa extractor service emit? Shane McCarron
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) Ben Adida
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) Manu Sporny
• RE: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) David Peterson
• Re: Did you guys see this? Ivan Herman
• Re: Did you guys see this? Elias Torres
• Re: Did you guys see this? Ben Adida
• Did you guys see this? Elias Torres

Saturday, 8 March 2008

• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) Ben Adida
• RE: meeting record: 2008-03-06 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) Simone Onofri
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) Ivan Herman

Friday, 7 March 2008

• Re: meeting record: 2008-03-06 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon Ralph R. Swick
• Re: meeting record: 2008-03-06 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon Ben Adida
• Re: meeting record: 2008-03-06 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon Christopher St John
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) Christopher St John
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) Ben Adida
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) Daniel E. Renfer
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) Ben Adida
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) Nathan Yergler
• We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) Manu Sporny
• Re: Primer updated with a Changes section Ben Adida
• RDFa Syntax Last Call Comment - Test 58 and Rule 11 Shane McCarron
• ISSUE-88 resolution Johannes Koch
• Re: super easy issues: ISSUE-93, ISSUE-94, ISSUE-95, ISSUE-96 Mark Birbeck
• Re: Primer updated with a Changes section Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? Mark Birbeck
• RDFa Primer review Manu Sporny

Thursday, 6 March 2008

• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? Norman Walsh
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? Norman Walsh
• meeting record: 2008-03-06 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon Ralph R. Swick
• Primer updated with a Changes section Ben Adida
• Re: a bit of levity Steven Pemberton
• Re: Agenda for Telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC. Simone Onofri
• RE: Agenda for Telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC. Hausenblas, Michael
• RE: super easy issues: ISSUE-93, ISSUE-94, ISSUE-95, ISSUE-96 Hausenblas, Michael
• Edge Conditions in Processing Rules that might benefit from test cases Shane McCarron
• Re: super easy issues: ISSUE-93, ISSUE-94, ISSUE-95, ISSUE-96 Manu Sporny
• Agenda for Telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC. Ben Adida
• a bit of levity Ben Adida

Wednesday, 5 March 2008

• Re: test case 0011 Ivan Herman
• Re: test case 0011 Mark Birbeck
• Re: test case 0011 Mark Birbeck
• Re: test case 0011 Mark Birbeck
• Re: test case 0011 Johannes Koch
• Re: test case 0011 Ivan Herman
• Re: test case 0011 Johannes Koch
• Re: test case 0011 Ivan Herman
• Re: test case 0011 Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 4 March 2008

• Re: ISSUE-89 Mark Birbeck
• Re: test case 0011 Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-89 Ivan Herman
• Re: quick one: ISSUE-91 Ben Adida
• Re: ISSUE-89 Mark Birbeck
• Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221 Ben Adida
• Re: Call time changes next week Steven Pemberton
• Re: ISSUE-89 Ivan Herman
• Re: Call time changes next week Steven Pemberton
• Re: ISSUE-89 Mark Birbeck
• Call time changes next week Steven Pemberton
• test case 0011 Johannes Koch
• Re: quick one: ISSUE-91 Mark Birbeck
• Re: discussion and resolution of ISSUE-87 Mark Birbeck
• Re: discussion and resolution of ISSUE-87 Shane McCarron
• Re: quick one: ISSUE-91 Shane McCarron
• Re: ISSUE-89 Ivan Herman
• ISSUE-89 (was: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221) Johannes Koch
• Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221 Johannes Koch
• RE: EARL Report(s) for ARC Hausenblas, Michael
• super easy issues: ISSUE-93, ISSUE-94, ISSUE-95, ISSUE-96 Ben Adida
• Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221 Ben Adida
• quick one: ISSUE-91 Ben Adida
• Re: discussion and resolution of ISSUE-87 Ben Adida
• discussion and resolution of ISSUE-87 Ben Adida

Monday, 3 March 2008

• Regrets for 6 March Shane McCarron
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? Shane McCarron
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? Norman Walsh
• latest Primer edits Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? Norman Walsh
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? Shane McCarron
• RDFa Syntax Last Call comment - section 5.4.3 Shane McCarron
• RDFa Syntax Last Call Comment - typo in section 5.4 Shane McCarron
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? Mark Birbeck
• RE: EARL Report(s) for ARC Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? Norman Walsh
• EARL Report(s) for ARC Benjamin Nowack
• RE: [RDFa TC] Status Benjamin Nowack
• RE: [RDFa TC] Status Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? Ben Adida
• Re: [RDFa TC] Status Benjamin Nowack
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? Norman Walsh
• Re: additional test needed Ivan Herman
• Re: additional test needed Shane McCarron
• [RDFa TC] Status Hausenblas, Michael
• RE: additional test needed Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: test case 0005 Johannes Koch
• RE: test case 0005 Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: [RDFa TC] interpretation of TC results Ivan Herman
• test case 0005 Johannes Koch
• RE: [RDFa TC] interpretation of TC results Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: additional test needed Ivan Herman
• Re: [RDFa TC] interpretation of TC results Benjamin Nowack
• RE: [RDFa TC] interpretation of TC results Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: [RDFa TC] interpretation of TC results Ivan Herman
• [RDFa TC] interpretation of TC results Hausenblas, Michael

Sunday, 2 March 2008

• Re: additional test needed Shane McCarron
• Re: additional test needed Ivan Herman

Saturday, 1 March 2008

• additional test needed Shane McCarron
• Re: Last Call comment on RDFa Syntax Ivan Herman

Last message date: Monday, 31 March 2008 20:25:21 UTC