- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:52:45 +0200
- To: "XHTML WG" <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
- Cc: "Forms WG" <public-forms@w3.org>
------- Forwarded message -------
From: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
To: chairs@w3.org
Cc:
Subject: Pubrules update: XHTML+RDFa permitted as DTD in non-Recs
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:50:01 +0200
Hello,
In order to help test "RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing" [1],
which was published as a Candidate Recommendation on 20 June,
pubrules is hereby updated to allow technical reports (except
for Recommendations) to use the XHTML+RDFa DTD. The validator
and the pubrules checker both support this DTD.
This change affected two pubrules provisions, which now read:
1. All normative representations MUST either:
* validate as either HTML 4.x or as some version of XHTML that is a
W3C Recommendation, or
* validate as XHTML+RDFa; see RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing
(not yet a W3C Recommendation; Team Contacts please see the
Communications Team to propose additional exceptions).
2. At least one normative representation MUST identify itself as HTML
4.x, or XHTML 1.0, or XHTML+RDFa (for backwards compatibility).
Thank you,
_ Ian
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/CR-rdfa-syntax-20080620
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2008 14:53:22 UTC