- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:20:57 -0400
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Thank you for making these editorial changes, especially for URIorSafeCURIE. I'm disappointed in your decision to not change "recurse" to "recur". I'm wondering what precedent you considered in doing this - your experience of "conventional" seems to be different from mine. I've usually seen "recurse" in email and discussion groups, and second-rate publications, but not in writings from reputable, literate authors and publishers. But it's been a long time since I've followed the computer science literature, so things may have degraded. I just hate to see this kind of noise and irregularity enter the language. Jonathan On Jun 16, 2008, at 1:24 AM, Ben Adida wrote: > Jonathan, > > If you can let me know ASAP your response to ISSUES 104 and 105, > that would be great: > > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/104 > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/105 > > (on the mailing list would be ideal: > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org) > > -Ben
Received on Monday, 16 June 2008 11:21:37 UTC