- From: Micah Dubinko <Micah.Dubinko@marklogic.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:19:12 -0700
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Now that the spec is fresh in your mind, how about taking a few minutes to spot the undoubtedly numerous bugs I've inserted in the functional descripton of RDFa? http://rdfa.info/wiki/Functional_RDFa All input is welcome. Edit away! -m On 6/10/08 9:16 PM, "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I finally found the time to finish my Ruby cleanroom implementation, and > I can now say with great certainty that the spec is fully correct. > > Well okay, I didn't quite finish in the sense that I have *not* tried to > get the XMLLiterals right, in terms of namespaces and such. > > All tests other than the XMLLiterals pass, and I've inspected the failed > tests by hand, and the only deviation is related to proper namespaces > within XMLLiterals. (Specifically, test 11,92,94,100,101,102,103.) > > I wrote this cleanroom implementation straight from the spec, without > trying to optimize anything. I made a few stupid Ruby mistakes, and I > missed two points in the spec that I then had to fix: > > (A) I forgot to *not* set skip=true when @property was present, Step 4. > > (B) I forgot to clone the evaluation context when skip=true, Step 11. > > Interestingly, issue (A) was very quickly visible with multiple test > failures. Issue (B), on the other hand, I didn't notice until the very > end. As it turns out, only test 84 failed as a result. > > In any case, I can say now with great certainty that the spec is fully > correct. > > If you're interested, the code in all of its ugliness is at: > > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/impl/ruby/ > > (ignore the html5lib, which I'm deleting. You need it, but just get the > gem.) > > and I have it running at: > > http://ben.adida.net/rdfa/ruby/rdfa.cgi?uri= > > Note that, to run the tests, I used triplr.org for conversion: > http://triplr.org/ben.adida.net/rdfa/ruby/rdfa.cgi?uri= > > -Ben > > PS: and as it turns out, the HTML5 parser *does* pick up @rev, the bug > was in *my* code. >
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2008 05:19:48 UTC