Manu Sporny wrote: > Seaborne, Andy wrote: >> It is possible to get non-canonicalized XML literals into >> the data by using datatype XMLLiteral even in RDF/XML. > > So this means that @datatype and @parseType don't do the same thing when > dealing with XML Literal data. > > The string in the element containing @datatype isn't modified at all. > > The string in the element containing @parseType IS modified via XML > Exclusive Canonicalization. > And as I commented before, I wonder whether this is not a bug in the RDF/XML spec. However, this group should not spend too much time on an issue that is not for this group to solve... > Ivan, the easiest thing to do at this point is for you to NOT change > your implementation and I'll just write the SPARQL to match what your > implementation generates. > Yes, that is fine. > Although, in light of this new discovery, it makes the learning curve > even steeper for XML Literals. > :-( Ivan > -- manu > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2008 07:41:20 UTC