I agree, and my apologies if my reference to the note looked otherwise. We can write a Note, say, while the AC is voting on the Proposed rec of the current document, ie, when the group will have nothing else to do:-) The priority is the Rec! Ivan Ben Adida wrote: > Hausenblas, Michael wrote: >> However, it *should* be permitted to contemplate >> on possible future directions. > > I have no say in what is or isn't "permitted" of course! > > I'm only stating my opinion regarding the scope of our REC track > package, making sure we don't add to our existing burden. Even an > additional note within the REC track package could delay us significantly. > > -Ben > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 17:11:31 UTC