- From: Laurian Gridinoc <laurian@gridinoc.name>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:31:26 +0000
- To: "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@formsplayer.com>
- Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hello, On 23/01/2008, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsplayer.com> wrote: > Apologies, but I don't quite follow the question about being more or > less verbose. Which triples to use would really depend on what it is > that you want to say, rather than any general rules. I'm thinking of what would be the minimum useful information, the goal being to have a human user to specify the meaning/disambiguate of some terms, or persons (in foaf case). I think in some cases @instanceof could be omitted and recovered by who is concerned by dereferencing @about. I'll think of some detailed examples. > Out of interest though, are you planning to add those attributes > within the browser, by manipulating the DOM? For the moment yes, only at DOM, think at integrating "at-the-glass(dom)" with ther RDFa aware extensions, the DOM is transient, but other extensions can pick up the annotations and save them (i.e. a RDFa aware PiggyBank). I also look into doing this annotation within the editing area of WYSIWYG html editors in web pages, such that you can annotate with RDFa your blog entry prior to publishing; so the persistence would be delegated to the blog engine. Cheers, -- Laurian Gridinoc, purl.org/net/laur
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 21:31:37 UTC